Laserfiche WebLink
question to ‘rlgrinlton® of "'Se^draln'iie^ld »y«^®”\hrp*ro®p''o^sVd addl^^:s,rtV^^^ert\r,n'v«%^^^,couianot^b:i„'q manner «%i"|e«!Efe* loo.tlon on PI^IEE^Irty”. There is "O ” further development of this P^P^^uilliJg'thrcurrently P’^°P°|\\" Milhboihood? Council has <br />pal sewers are f,\“ X„ <br />I determination as to if questions and <br />T ‘ls^Vn'tEuld"hE“ c«r* nVlLsg^ ‘r'E'si'de‘nol “ on ‘'S <br />.^%”rcrvari.nce, BiJ'is'JKje'ot to°‘the on-site sewage <br />rt“ctdeT-U?o^« -- <br />R«co —endation - Planning Commission <br />Rside from the «P\i= f”EE*s”ide‘seVb'ack variance bs»ed on <br />!L„'n\‘=Cin"g'no ‘’ricse"r to' the side lot .^"qVe'JuridlSg^ot, no <br />EEEl considering bo« 4 and 5 « “nV cIndition of »PPb°«i <br />rirgt«i\r be“"rha't= rhrvw%; lots be c-bined^ f« <br />^raTirPrarnVc"oLssion^is -/AVb'l^r III <br />e'nns“’'a1,'ort i; s“^st.^ <br />will effectively in°^«*!®^ti!tls a potential for <br />Ltions this residences that oerhaps cannot beibitants of tnis r future that pernap <br />tic system problems ^ until municipel sew <br />Zoning File #1458 September 15# 1989 Page 5 of 5A conservative interpretation of Section 12.30# Subdivision 4 (E) would require that the existing system be upgraded to be totally conforming to current codes. That is not possible on this lot# in staff's estimation based on knowledge of the area. A more liberal interpretation tempered with the thought that municipal sewer may be in the offing# would go so far as to allow the addition with or without extension of the existing trench drainfield# with the property owner being advised that major expansion over and above the two bedroom threshhold would not be approved until municipal sewer is provided.\l ^ <br />r tJ -^ ! .