02-26-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

E-xanning commission Members •City Administrator BernhardsonMichael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator September 15, 198911458 Blake Bichanich, 332 Westlake Street - Variance - Public HearingSMwered^‘“' l«lt«8hore residential, 2".t'oAr* addilionf conetructIbitstttttttttABCDEPGHIApplication Letter of Request Plat MapProperty Owners List Survey with Staff Notations Hardcover Calculations Elevation Views & Floor Plans Engineer lets - f "hiVi owner of Lots 4 and 5, ^Ve8DVctlvelS''^''?h^®° Westlake Lcitv contains no plumbing but does have , currently used as a guest house for the ^fh structure at 332 Westlake Street, igh the two lots are separate for tax purposes ies iS^Mder ^® ^®^® refinance the twoies in order to combine them for tax purposes. m L^t s'"® Ad®d"l*ln«n°.??"®^K“®^ ® second story on the t ^® be constructing a ating wtl“ Vf th°eTols°e. 1" Una with it i^;nSflTy‘r,',n7“e‘? ‘ MdiUo„V“v’''’?r tes are taken into account, the north side setback is _]« p*n~% «<Bi Zoning File #1458 September 15, 1989 Page 2 of 54. Hardcover on the property is as follows;0-75* 75-250' 250-500*500-1000'Lot 5 OnlyLots 4 & 5 Combined 1.7%0.9%20.9%15.4%20.6%*10.1%20%*10%* Includes entire width of drivewayBased on the above, hardcover is not a factor in the current proposal.Applicant also proposes an extension of the house 8' east of the existing wall. This would be located over the area of the pre-existing porch which applicant has torn off. Note that this addition would line up exactly with the neighboring house to the south. It would extend nearer the lake than the "guest house" on Lot 4, but would be behind the average lakeshore setback defined by the next lakeshore residence to the north at 3865 Bayside Road. The proposed lakeward addition would be approximately 150' back from the normal shoreline. The site topography, location of wells on this property and the neighboring property, and the fact that this is a long, narrow lakeshore lot, all have a very limiting effect on the additional development of this property without municipal sewer. Discussion - If the applicant cannot combine these two properties, you should look at Lot 5 as a separate parcel for variance review. It would certainly be preferrable from a development standpoint if the applicant could combine the two parcels and develop towards the center of the property to maintain appropriate setbacks. For purposes of this staff review, the assumption is made that Lots 4 and 5 will ultimately be combined. No average lakeshore setback variance is required presuming that the adjacent residence to the north is 3865 Bayside Road. The average lakeshore setback line is drawn under this assumption. Applicant would not be encroaching nearer either north or south lot lines, but would be extending approximately 10-12' vertically above the existing roof. As of this writing, no comment from the neighbor to the south, who would be most affected by the addition, has been received.