Laserfiche WebLink
MINDTES OP THB PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 18, 1989ZONING FILE #1456-EMPIKLD CONTINUEDMrs. Brad Childs, the prospective buyers of the property.Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that this is an application requesting approval of an after-the-fact structure-to-structure setback variance for a detached garage. Gaffron said that approval of this variance should be conditioned upon inspection by the City to verify that appropriate fire walls exist in both garages.Mr. Childs expressed his support for the approval of the variance.There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed.Planning Commissioner Cohen observed that the City had <br />^j-fften a letter to the Emfields on June 17, 1986 and questioned <br />whether anything further happened beyond that date? <br />Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth replied that the <br />Emfield's building contractor was supposed to meet with the <br />City's Building Official, but did not follow through. Mrs. <br />Emfield said that the contractor had indicated that he had <br />followed through, but he had not. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning <br />Commissioner Cohen, to recommend approval of the after-the-fact <br />structure-to-structure setback variance for a detached garage, <br />subject to the City's inspection of the fire wall and that the <br />garage remain detached. Motion, Ayes=6, Nays=0, Motion passed. <br />#1458 BLAKE M. BICHAHICH <br />332 WESTLAKE STREET <br />VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC BEARING 8:50 P.M. TO 9:05 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />duly noted. <br />Mr. and Mrs. Bichanich were present for this matter. <br />Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron provided <br />a brief explanation of this application for a side setback <br />variance to construct a second story addition. Gaffron also said <br />that the existing drainfield system is small and does not meet <br />the current codes, but it seems to be working. Gaffron also <br />explained the septic concerns involved with the proposed <br />expansion of this property (see MPG memo of 9/15/89). <br />Chairman Kelley asked Mr. Bichanich what the current use of <br />the guest house is and what he plans to do with the two lots? <br />1 n <br />‘ - > -