My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-26-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
02-26-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2024 10:39:24 AM
Creation date
9/6/2024 10:31:34 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
375
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
OF ?js-..v,--:r®»'»l*ne ^°^en BumT^<^ity1?'^®' the ®PPtovaIio normaii®^^®ctive ^ ^ 3925i:r •■"■«•«£=:«’•«■■■••..., <br />®rjr <br />TorFroa: Date: Subject:Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson 5"l-DO.'st/j, Wl> 'l.-,ij.? G (Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning AdministratorFebruary 22, 1990#1458 Blake Bichanich, 332 Westlake Street - Variance - Second Review - ResolutionZoning District - LF-IA, Single family lakeshore residential, 2 acre, unseweredApplication - Request for side setback variance to construct second story addition.List Of Exhibits ^ tzrsco^TffiNExhibit A - Memo & Exhibits of 10/19/89 Exhibit B - Council Minutes of 10/23/89 Exhibit C - Notice of Council Action 10/27/89 Exhibit D - Letter to Applicant 11/29/89Discussion - <br />This item was tabled at your October 23, 1989 meeting in <br />order for applicant to work with staff regarding appropriate <br />language pertaining to the existing and future needs for <br />sewer/septic systems on this property. <br />Briefly, recall that the applicant wish to add a second <br />story to the existing residence, and construct a porch at the <br />southwest corner. The house is 13' from the south lot line, 8’ <br />from the north lot line, but 58' from the north lot line if the <br />adjacent commonly owned property is taken into account. Due to <br />the size of the property, hardcover was not a factor in the <br />application, and average setback was determined to not be a <br />problem. Staff had raised concerns about future septic needs. <br />The applicant had noted that due to ownership of the two parcels <br />on separate contracts for deed, he could not combine the two <br />properties until some future date. <br />Council directed staff to draft language regarding <br />conditions on methods and timing of septic system expansion <br />should it be needed in the future, and language for a possible <br />assessment appeal waiver to be incorporated as a requirement in <br />an approval resolution. <br />The applicant was sent a draft of an assessment appeal <br />waiver paragraph which he agrees to in principle, although staff <br />had suggested that perhaps he wait for the general appeal waiver <br />letter that is going to be sent to the Stubb's Pay neighborhood. <br />Since that general appeal waiver information has not been sent as <br />of this week, the applicant is requesting that Council go ahead <br />on the basis that applicant will agree to signing an assessment <br />appeal waiver for the reasonable share of the costs to serve his <br />property
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.