02-26-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

[N - If the Council does not desire an immediate imposition trtain dollar amount, there is a possibility that it could ted in over a 3 to 5 year period.STRATTON - Presently the schedule is relatively easy to jte. The new system would involve determination of value s subject over to some "disputv' depending on the proposed As presently proposed it does place the Council in the m of being the final arbiter of value on each subdivision, ernative would be to either base it on the Inst market for tax purposes or base the annual rate on a "Typical property to be set at the beginning of the year.DICATION POLICY - The City's Comprehensive P felt that ivelopment was appropriate in the urban areas out because rere 2 acre and 5 acre in the rural zone, that there was E a need for park facilities. To the extent that parks ewed strictly as open space, there is less of a need for en space in the 2 and 5 acre zones. However, those do not lemselves to other uses of parks such a organized sports, cant playground equipment, etc. FUNDS - The expenditures in the park areas have been on an d" basis, with no programming for these funds. It would opriate in conjunction with or as a follow up to this that k Commission be directed to develop a plan for utilization se funds. An initial need has been the desire for ntation utilizing these funds for implementation of the Lke system previously presented to the Council. No e has been made of the cost of this system and there is a review the use of park dedication funds for such ideas as ke trails. will note Attachment B was transmitted to the Planning Lon, but no responses have been received. )t the proposal as is. ! for further discussion :ur with the idea of a change however, table for ’ation of specifics. no action. 'JDATION - Given the fact that there has been no adjustment ark dedication fees for 15 years it would be appropriate :hange be made. The extent of the change however, should id until the Council's meeting in February. MOTION - Moved by _, seconded byA. - - - - - - - - - - - - —U r ^ ^ change the fees, however, delay specifics for the change s February 12, 1990 Council meeting. Ayes _, Nays k Commission members n R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director nne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator j.12889.3HD : -ij?/6COUNCIL MEETINC;Mayor Grabek S Orono Council Members Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator December 8, 1989 Subject: Park Dedication FeesAttachment A - Park Commission's Memo dated 11/9/8^1/7 OF GRONGTo;From:Date:DEC 111989XSSU6SProviding Council with Park Commission's proposal regarding alteration of the manner in which City collects Park DedicationFees.Introduction -As noted, the Park Commission has been reviewing the City's park dedication system. The proposal would bring it more in-line with the practice and fees of area municipalities. Alternatives - Issue #1 - 1. Accept. 2. Discuss. 3. Table. Reo mendation - It is recommended that the Issue be tabled for further discussion at the Council's January 8, 1990 meeting should the Council desire to amend the present system. A subsequent am^^dment to the general fee ordinance can be done at anytime to be effect upon publication. Proposed Motion - Moved by Council accept the information seconded by the Orono the Park Commission regarding their recommendation regarding alternation of the Park Dedication Fees. Ayes ___, nays