02-26-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

capacity in the line that so.eone • t « •. *• 'thete not be could use?e • can be put in according toBiniraum diameter me . obviouslyI requirements would be in this area..erve more than the “and utilize thisf areas could be hoo oossibility o£ having acity. Staff haa capacity picked up by theLon of the cost of the P eventually be fundedinltlaily aa a f“’/t;,e extent that thia lahose who may ^ ^ set aside as reserve, every $100,000 that the C / ^p^oximately $1^000ge would reduce should be rememberedunit based on 100 “"Vi be hooking into the line on "^*V?'Rd''!^rw'nich has -reserve capacity- for area and for future areas. \,Le is no cawa paid for Vbe rebated anything as a resultcipation that they would be rebateo ay his improvement.) .« «. . l.«. lot CCS you stay cut of th. a.«t been the City’s “ ‘"'^b«ause yru'’no» hare an ^V/rita^y"‘iispri\hat you Ptevi.^^^^^ not haue J you Choose not ‘““““ 'ne hiok un in the study area “ rh:nun:Vor:;rtr\s .onths and pay for th. emente ^in, be Chirped to help us afford th, l.proe««»t7 ,5 this «” fn *tli°a “rea". “ihla^as r :roVhVr \v.as :Vth.-r Jing the crystal by the residents nor any and there has been no q ,.u_t area (It should be .tic. by th. City to bh, bulk Of that even if rezoned remain substandard.) ots in the Crystal considered, the City would ,<j a request for . ^Iso, to the extent to amend its Comprehensive Plan. Ais , that individual properties were looking for additional hookups that would help decrease the overall unit charge but that property would then have to pay for more units.8. Will a new subdivision, such as the one being proposed eastof Leaf Street, be included in the project?It has not been the policy of the City to include any areas that do not absolutely need sewer. This area is developing to a 2 acre standard and preliminary indications are that it will have adequate conditions for on-site septic systems on each building site. Even if the City were to allow sewering of this area, the topography of the area would require significant design parameters that would not result in a substantial reduction in unit lateral cost for the Stubbs Bay project, inclusion of all those units in the project may reduce the trunk cost by about 20%. (100 units in Stubbs Bay 22, units in "Sussex") 9. (fby is the property on Oxford Road being left out? Again, this area was developed to the 2 acre standard and although it is lakeshore property which differentiates it from the property east of Leaf, it is not contemplated to e included as t.here should be adequate septic systems for this area. Based on general City policy we have not addressed this cuestion to the Council but we will address both this and th‘e question regarding the subdivision. The inclusion of the Oxford property would probably reduce t.he trunk cost by about 10%. (10 properties) 10. BOW soon conld a project be undertaken? The project progress is dependent on the level of the neighborhood. If substantial interest is generated this fall and hearings could be held this winter, plans could be drawn thl^ winter and construction begun in the opting. It is important to realize that the Council will probably no undertake this project unless a substantial majority o property owners are interested in undertaking this project to the point of agreeing to sign a waiver of appeal on project. This is a neighborhood problem, and the neighborhood should get together to decide how they want t solve it. (It was mentioned that the current prices are as