02-26-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

•Jconcern*. „„«.iae - ® * ,2 require theih Ercperty/^*^ — property ^ proel^* *Tthe th»t P"**"*JJ,tea that^reer« ^^jV-rt. ‘t -ouia notalqnUic- hcreen.►he cotiE^ps'e o'. \te VJfconcern destroyed. across b ^tra^ternlte "be *pl^clng the lateral "n aXternatluo wouU P °iae of Ot.orU- .,Ue o. Oxforo. ^ rhat wouia be ofiSSESi routing ot thS^n'JlWtnate aeslqn ^ cheaper * “':?th the laterals nav E'» th. sEaE^o¥^e^-‘'^\S*FH:a'r. done in hop Bederwooa s'® ^pn looted at. '’Wbrreaucea or *o»* s'*'®.; |osta but would "rer-v'Vhir^u - "••ease another s. a ^ MW ?ase another s. -ooosea only skirt asoent process connection Charge _ caustically but the process b®rpretatlon can^^nE^, th. <;^,‘b“u pay d is Tfciftn that the area project taken the a ''substantial risk 3 process P have th -rt^ect »ay ‘ Ejt bh. VaVproJect. th* prj»3®'^ ^,^eaa in the Cry*”i-®tit! the P®C^‘‘°bbC b®"®“‘ “all. ^ ►o decide what th decide individual ^^"^'baving a court arbij ^^^^tion to fty rather th . _gd that any ^be sal« 'lug to ‘Ully be '‘‘^t'^ts^n who does ‘®® "«les ?roryear to year, a P le it varies i1•Ml a bathroom improvement may realize 75% of their investment where someone who puts in a pool may realize only 20% of their investment at the future sale of the property.Lateral Options - The two areas were offered the option of extending laterals providing they pay for the assessment. The question was, if they do not have a lateral, can the City prove the market benefit?Should sufficient numbers not indicate an interest in doing the trunk only, the City may in fact do the lateral and assess the trunk and put a connection charge for the lateral portion of it thereby better insuring it would get its full value. The staff indicated past projects absent Crystal Bay were paid for by those receiving sewer (currently staff is reviewing all projects to verify this.) 5. City Contribution - Other funding sources - To the best of our knowledge there are no other funding sources that are available. The City is willing, however, to finance this over a 15 to 20 year period, both the assessment and any connection charges the City may charge. Who is providing the momentum for this project? Is it the residents? While the City had in its Comprehensive Plan in 1980 identified this area as an area for sewering the primary imputus has been from the neighborhood from those people who have failed or failing systems, from those on holding tanks, and from those who wish to improve their properties but can't because of septic system constraints. As such, it will be up to the residents themselves to decide if they want this project to go ahead or not. J