My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-26-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
02-26-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2024 10:39:24 AM
Creation date
9/6/2024 10:31:34 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
375
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
/Lot Areai0‘1 99 acre2 00*3 00 acre3 01*3 50 acre 3 51 4.00 acre ^ 01 4 50 acre ^ 51*5.00 acre5 01*6 00 acre6 01*7 00 acre7 01*8 00 acre 5 01*9.00 acre 5^1 acre or more Maximum Individual Accessory Structure footprint Areaby the lollowrnT^bf^^^^^«Mwimuiu Mowed Total of All Accessory Siruciwo Foolprlnl At^ on'^e Properly, -WWW VI rTKJfO ■•.OWMiSSi’i.™*1 _____1.000 a t1.200 a I1.400 a I1.600 a.I 1.800 a.f.2.000 a f.2.200 a.f.2.400 a f.2.600 a.I. 2.600 a I3.000 a.fe sha4 ®ccesaofy struc-raw lot lare regtdlesa^Thefhi^^^ lew elruclurS aSlbSfcl'JX <br />principal reaWer^e aSw'*^'’!"' <br />-aOy whichever la u.. <br />2.000 a.f.2.400 a.f.2.600 a I.3.200 el.3.600 t.l.4.000 if.4.400 i f. 4.800 i f,5.200 i f5.600 if6.000 i.f <br />SiSSSi51S55S <br />ai«H «"«1 of Ihia lime pmlod ,f|l <br />s;»S:ThaX?’c^; <br />Si~3r-~ <br />K iur'lH”'"'Municipal Code <br />^3“J03. Subdivisions 14 (CJ and (D) as <br />»».r;w..rs.s <br />1... c«.s„'tr"r.r 5 <br />nnls courts, pools, patios deck. .„h <br />'tesedT »1’en patliaL wlosed by fences, raltinos or walls whfrt <br />portion ^iuch^ruelurea e't***rt'*''*'’6 above grade tevriTlil ! "wo than" co^X")Oavatoped lot ahMbTSjU^’ ?i2m*mo <br />I0 the following apeeW *“*^1 <br />aw* *aw wai *** "®* **'**' '•■ <br />01 ?^IO-»» wow.*. <br />•"•-"s Kissx'ssr <br />allure o* l«,d ahVli^ ,^rlcl^ <br />f“Jv! **k conduit >.U Mr^'^®®^bouses. Commerr'iii <br />provided all outside aloraOTTtte^r.Vif"*** <br />a manner so ea to acr.l» •»! . '•** *" •«:*' <br />from view when <br />•Oaal Of arJKrlnlng^rXISJS'Jir•»«ae ilriMiiiree ihiinJSiKtf*'.*^^ <br />ragulred ward area .Llw*! ^ •••Wad hi a <br />•8ar to the J!.!?** *"^661 fur***iSr;Ji2r:r <br />lion 10.03. Sec- <br />Ihe Principal building nwtithhil’i!!!’/*"* ®' <br />•"Other .eeeeeoS Zitar? <br />Dorothy M Hallln. city clerh <br />James R Qmbek. Mayor <br />l^bHshed In The Laker amt m.19691 *"6 Pioneer Aug. gg <br />'■1I:I 13190.5Mayor and City CouncilMark E. Bernhardson, City AdministratoP^^TO:FROM:OATS; January 31, 1990 SUBJECT: Stubbs Bay Sewer Project COUNCIL MEETINGFEB 2 * 1990emroFORONOAttachment:A. Stubbs Bay Significant Questions - January 30,1990 MeetingB. Stubbs May Memo Dated 1/16/90C. Stubbs Bay Letter DraftD. Draft Petition and Special Assessment WaiverE. Letter from Terry OlsonISSUE <br />1. Provide a summary of significant questions from the meeting on <br />January 30th. <br />2. Outline process steps for Council to consider if this is the <br />appropriate route to go. <br />3. Provide opportunity for review of the letter and draft <br />petition prior to its transmittal to the area. <br />4. Present information relevant to any City contribution to the <br />project in advance of the letter being trasmitted. <br />INTRODUCTION - After a brief overview at the beginning of t*"» <br />meeting which encapsulated the presentation from last summer t.’-’*- <br />forum was opened up to questions and comments. While several <br />questions were repetitious of those from the previous meeting <br />there were some new ones that are summarized in Attachment A. <br />DISCUSSION <br />Issue - Meeting Summary - in addition to the questions <br />outli’ned there were comments such as the gentlemen who felt that <br />the project was needed even though he h.a,i sufficient room for an <br />additional septic system. He Lvit that the property was much <br />more marketable with a sewer system, providing a wider range of <br />people who were willing to buy it, together with it being a <br />permanent solution. What was not mentioned was the ability of <br />someone to add to their house with sewer, which may well be <br />restricted without it. <br />It was indicated in the discussion that the City would consider <br />the project if 70% of the people in the area were willing to sign <br />the waiver at this point. The process of petition and signing <br />tne waiver for a specific amount allows each individual person to <br />decide if the benefit to them of the project is sufficient to <br />"sign on for that amount" rather than the City permitting a Court
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.