Laserfiche WebLink
minutes op the ORONO council meeting op AUGUST 14# <br />ZONING PILE #1424-WINDWARD MARINE CONTINUED <br />excellent, esoecially since hardcover was being reduct <br />original proposal. Goetten did indicate, however, th <br />the same concerns about safety and the crossing of _ ^ - - <br />She asked to see the plan amended to show an access to the <br />crosswalk. <br />It was moved by Counci Imember Goetten, seconded by <br />Councilmember Peterson: to adopt Resolution #2674, approving the <br />renewal variances and commercial site plan for Windward *.arin . <br />Motion, Ayes-4, Nays»0, Motion passed. <br />«142S HARD FERRELL <br />3405 WATERTOWN ROAD <br />VARIANCB/SUBDIVISIOH ^ of '■heMr. James Macl^innon, Attorney, was present on behal. of whe <br />Ferrells. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson provided a brief history of <br />this application for a lot area variance and lot combination. <br />Mr. MacKinnon provided a brief history of the <br />property and the City of Orono's change <br />Mr MacKinnon said that the City's ordinance disallowing <br />buildabiiity of single owner substandard adjacent lots was a orm <br />o? dfJcriiiLtfion with no basis. He said that he was requsting <br />approval for one additional lot, rat er t.han two lots. <br />Mavor Grabek recollected that due to the history and <br />location of the lot he had previously <br />aoorove one additional lot. He questioned staff as to whether <br />the resulting lot size would conform to the neighboring lot <br />s?^n Gaf//on confirs.ed that lots in that <br />from 1 acre to 2 acres and that there were 3/4 acre lots on <br />Cygnet Place. <br />Councilmember Goetten said t.hat she too had <br />that she would be willing to approve one additional lot. <br />CounciImembers Peterson and Callahan concurred. <br />Tt was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by <br />Councilmember Peterson, to conceptually approve the <br />variance for Ward and Mary Ferrell with staff to draft a formal <br />Approval resolution. Motion, Ayes»4, Nays-0, Motion passed. <br />ACCESSORY STRUCTURE ORDINANCE #72, SKOND SMES oointed <br />Assistant Planning and Zoning w-ve <br />out the specific areas of this Ordinance where the <br />problems. Gaffron said that the Ordinance may “jJ®.,ites ' <br />in certain cases, to maintain the setbacks from drainfield sites. <br />Councilmember Goetten said that it was the original intent <br />of thJrSrdinance amendment process to carefully <br />of accessory structures that people were putting o.i their 1°^®* <br />Ihe bSII^ve^ Sat especially where small lots are concerned, a