Laserfiche WebLink
lie #1475 16, 1989, m.lte has indicat'd ^5 ^Sru"ir°prr,?r ^J;“^,i3t*a„r«6"5“irU%ved thr-,h ac.aS”\i°keVy hive'w be reviewed by the City." 1 a-Ka» late 1950s orarse -tv* to get from Tract F ^ the White; White's P^°P®’"Tearse granted an properties known <br />5' ^“dftfonar«"eien%°o«r White's property, <br />int the additions the subdivision <br />,tal£ discussed the applicant ear ^y^^ <br />? i s%'. ;“Tvft“:"r”ad-^--‘- <br />^-»dUIUd //o^“Vhe“ad1acent property.^^ <br />applicant ««“«''/ T\eHoe'"apJ11can‘3is°erit^"ot*1 <br />:!s4°4i'nro\“lo\%'T£i‘’b^^^^^^^^ h’-ave be"en \o%lfe <br />, Standard is met. Tne <br />[ a flag lot. <br />E Rccomendation - a,-<vewav outlot <br />, ■ 1- is providing a private this <br />The of the existing access * construction <br />on City <br />i ;rre«%rcode <br />l! <br />Zoning File #1475 November 16, 1989 Page 4 of 4Based on the above, staff would recommend approval of the proposed subdivision based on the following conditions:1. On the plat drawings, Bayside Ridge Road shall be designated as a private road outlot, "Outlot B". Outlot B is intended to remain in private ownership, and be privately maintained. Because this plat effectively only creates a fourth building site where three building sites already existed, no upgrading of the private road is required as part of this subdivision.2. Lots 2 and 3 shall be served by private access driveways via Outlets A and B. (Does Planning Commission feel that there is any justification to allow access for Lot 2 directly to Bayside Road? No word from Hennepin County on their position as of this writing.)3. Standard Park Dedication Fees shall be paid for Lots 2 and 3.4. Standard Drainage & Utility Easements to be shown on the plat drawings. <br />5. Prior to filing of the subdivision, applicant sT.all <br />satisfy the City Attorney that proper legal access is <br />provided to the property. <br />•4 <br />•#