Laserfiche WebLink
H Zoning File #1475November 16, 1989Page 2 of 4■» q-ha leant is oroDosing a north/south division line toBites. The applicant noted thst the?idqriine and location of drainfield sites suggests that 4-hA nroDOsed house locations are centrally located within each^proposed lot, and that an east/west lot line would result in^ less functional lots due to the slope of the north h*i f ftf the lot. In order to provide interior access to Lot 2 aoolicMt proposes a 25* oStlot to the proposed "Bayside Ridae^Road". Applicant would prefer to serve Lot 2 with a seofratrdrivewa? from Bayside Road, but it is questionable whether the County will approve an access site Road especially if an alternate access is feasible. Remember that Orono Code requires that all newly created lots be served by interior roads whenever possible.4 Acnlicant has provided a 25' corridor for what is shown on Jhe plat as -Bayside Ridge Road". This corridor generally Darallels the private driveway that serves four existing <br />residences. Although not shown on the survey, the existing <br />driveway location is west of this outlot, on the Rezabek <br />property (see Exhibit G). Staff would anticipate that an <br />additional 25' outlot could someday be added to the west of <br />this -oposed outlot, for private road purposes. <br />5 Prima and alternate drainfield sites have been tested in <br />nc^o^f the proposed new lots. The Hayssen property has <br />alternate drainfield sites to the south <br />existing system. The McDowell re^^dence at 4105 Bayside <br />Road exceeds 5 acres in area and appears to contain a number <br />of possible drainfield sites. Alternate site testing is not <br />required. <br />All of the sites tested require mound systems, <br />S The neighboring property owner to the north and west, Robert <br />■ White hL challenged the validity of the easeiaent acroes his <br />nronAri-v out to Bayside Road (see Exhibit I). The City <br />Attorney has preliminarily reviewed the concerns and has <br />sSooestid that, since Minnesota Title insured the access <br />easement on file, it would likely be up to Minnesota Title <br />t^take whatever steps are necessary to provide access to <br />the affected properties. The City Attorney advises that any <br />approval of the proposed subdivision be conditioned upon the <br />applicant providing suitable documentation that the access <br />issue has been resolved, prior to filing of the division.