Laserfiche WebLink
m Planning Commission Chairman Kelley <br />Orono Planning Commission Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson n <br />Prom: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />January 11, 1990 <br />♦'les Hayssen,#1475 John McDowell • ‘ <br />4045 - 4135 Bayside Rc ' <br />Lot Line Rearrangement/Suodivision - Continuation of <br />Public Hearing <br />List of Exhibits - <br />Exhibit A - Letter from Hennepin County 1/3/90 with <br />Attachment <br />Letter from Hennepin County 11/30/89 <br />Proposed Easement Sketch & Legal Description <br />Letter from Applicant Hayssen Affirming <br />Endorsement <br />Sketches, 3 Options <br />Notice of Planning Commission Action 11/21/89 <br />Memo & Exhibits of 11/3 6/89 <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Exhibit E <br />Exhibit P <br />Exhibit G <br />Discussion - <br />At your November 20th meeting. Planning Commission tabled <br />the applicant's request pending further information regarding <br />Hennepin County's position on access via the existing private <br />road as opposed to new access directly from Bayside Road. <br />Additionally, you directed the applicant to pursue obtaining the <br />easement over the existing private road. <br />Hennepin County originally reviewed this request in November <br />1989 and determined that there is no safe access within Lot 2's <br />Bayside Road frontage. The County at that time supported the use <br />of Outlot A to provide access for Lot 2 via the existing private <br />road. <br />At the same time, McDowell was pursuing the issue with Mr. <br />White as to whether any or all of the McDowel 1/Hayssen/Alt <br />properties could use the existing private road. <br />McDowell and White have tentatively agreed that Alt and <br />Hayssen can continue to use the existing private road. <br />McDowell's Lots 2 and 3 would not be allowed to use the private <br />road. White would agree to convey an easement to McDowell <br />through the tiangular wetland area north of Lots 2 and 3. The <br />easement would appear to be easterly of the wetland boundary. <br />This 30* driveway easement would be merely a shared driveway <br />for Lots 2 and 3. Hennepin County in their letter of January 3rd <br />located and approved this specific access point, as meeting the <br />minimum site distance standards for a shared driveway.