Laserfiche WebLink
• r>ed ^ <br />?ajssen7 P'°'teV a° "tl <br />:"5riSH:^S“S;S-S.r^^o addeo. vihi^^ aoprovax ^ . g app^^ <br />.. „. ..in.;- <br />MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 16, 1990ZONING PILE 31475-MCDOWELL CONTINUEDsubdivision. The other concern is that Mr. White might prevail in the lawsuit and the City would have ar unsatisfactory access onto Bayside Road rather than the one the County approved.Kelley withdrew his motion.It was moved by Brown, seconded by Hanson, to recommendapproval of Option A for access to Tract A across the Whiteproperty, including staff recommendations 1 through 6 of Gaffron's memo dated 1/11/90.Mr. Owens asked that the Outlot running north and south be labeled Outlot "B", rather than Bayside Ridge Road. Brown incorporated that into his motion. Kelley asked whether Outlot A is still required? Gaffrcn said that with the proposed easement, there is direct access through the easement to Bayside. If you have Outlot A, then Lot 2 would have possible future access to Bayside via the existing White driveway. Brown agreed that they <br />should keep Outlot A. Kanscn seconded the amendments. <br />Kelley asked whether the Outlots would have any impact on the <br />dry buildable area of the newly created lots? Gaffron replied <br />that the dry buildable will be sufficient. Motion, Ayes-3, <br />Kelley, Cohen, Nays. <br />#1479 DOUG WILLIAMS & LECY CONSTRUCTION INC. <br />1020 TONKAWA ROAD <br />VARIANCES <br />CONTINUATION OP PUBLIC HEARING 8:50 P.M. TO 8:55 P.M. <br />Mr. Jurgen Stielow was present for this matter. <br />Gaffron provided the Planning Commission with the <br />information regarding the revised plan proposed by Mr. Williams. <br />Mrs. Marge Gasch, 1030 Tonkawa Road, wanted to be sure that <br />grading would occur to alleviate the runoff coming from this <br />property onto her property. Mrs. Gasch said that all of the <br />water coming from this property runs through her pumphouse. <br />Kelley questioned whether it would be necessary to approve <br />grading in the 0-75' setback zone? <br />Gaffron said it is not clear whether that may be necessary, <br />he has asked the applicants to supply additional grading plans <br />for the City Engineer's review. Gaffron said after talking to <br />Mrs. Gasch, he is questioning whether it may not be better to <br />bring the drainage to the center of the property and allow it to <br />disperse from there. <br />Kelley noted that grading will have to occur once the <br />existing house is removed. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />15 <br />•..... <br />>■ •