02-26-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CONT ijidedr:,::r-•"• •"-se the old deck had®*^ site lineodown the hi 11.^ of a "boxy- appea ® cf""®thick wood. ’ said that the railing^on th^'Ji ‘Bat the „e„ deck dc,.. ..>^Phhl!rh:iclrrwfs%V;?e.'^* puhXtc recardm, this matter^wFa? Port^ii^cL- onah-x:- -er^r„l"„ Th%" ling the laj£ch ^*^on, as I have been a ® n'inimal, is e, if you protective area ®'^PP°^f®r ol V within -^hat- other parts of t-h to the 75- "ever, i„ the past L,,/ "hat we we^e 'in=y ariie%^'tL^^= 4-""“ s^'/s/;rai ^ ''ith the previous 'as moved bv x«> •? i • the average lakt»^iF^ seconded by Moos t-n Motion passed, uid be removed, MCDOWELL =DoweXi™as‘^p^"° » = 25 P.M. TO 8:40 P H - the Attorney /or « «« Mr. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 16, 1990N 1 *3 •i:4»ZONING FILE #1475-MCDOWELL CONTINlGaffron provided a brief summary of this two part application involving a lot line rearrangement between the existing Hayssen and McDowell parcel and a subdivision. Gaffron explained the dilema involving access for the McDowell subdivision and said that a tentative agreement has been reached bv the • arties involved.Kelley said that the existing access is best to serve the properties and the proposed outlot to Bayside Road is absurd. Kelley compared this with the Wear Subdivision.Gaffron noted that this varied from Waar's subdivision in that there was a dedicated outlot going all the way to the Will property and the City had underlying road and utility easements. In this case, there is no outlot or existing easements. Gaffron said that the City would have to condemn land and look at the aspect of taking over a public road which would probably be very precedent setting. Kelley said that this is very unique and he has never run across anything like this. He said that it is absurd to give access to Bayside through the easement from Mr. White. Access to the McDowell property should come from the existing road. Cohen concurred with Kelley. Mabusth asked Mr. McDowell to identify the reason for the access being proposed. McDowell said that the proposal would offer a "win, win- situation for everyone. He explained that should the Council deny his application, he will go back to the Title Insurance Company and request access and the matter will go to Court. If Mr. White prevails and it is determined that Mr. McDowell cannot use the existing access, then the County will have to grant him access off of Bayside. Kelley said another option would be that the City steps in and takes over the road. Mr. McDowell said that the access being proposed onto Bayside is safer than the existing access onto Bayside. Gaffron confirmed that. Brown asked what the distance between the existing and proposed Bayside accesses will be. Mr. McDowell replied that is approximately 500'. McDowell added that he preferred this configuration, which will eliminate placing a cul-de-sac out in the middle of the field. Mr. McDowell asked the Planning Commission to vote on the lot line rearrangement portion of the application. Ih