My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-26-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
02-26-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2024 10:39:24 AM
Creation date
9/6/2024 10:31:34 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
375
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
>zom:te:bject:Chairman KelleyMichael P. saffron. Asst Planning s zoning Administrator November 17, 1989<ma ^- .-V,. ^onaitional Use Permit - Public Hearing 2^acre^^tewered^”^*' Single family lakeshore residentialfoTitnd alterfuJns^wUh?r^^^ variancet of ExhibitsS “ Application Exhibit B - Plat Map <br />Exhibit n “ Owners List <br />E^hiblJ ? I Proposed Grading Plan <br />Exhibit G - Staff^s°site*i' Houset)catf s Site Inspection Notes 10/11/89 <br />binent Pacts - <br />1055 West°PerndVle remodeling work at <br />no Indictcion was ever given ^to^tiSf/i?"^.''^® submitted and <br />w^o^^d\%-ta\--- - - -/y- a-s7Jr^ t^^t^^ <br />scheme into^|"*teriac6d a?ei"^Sith full®®** southwest deck <br />This resulted in some exctvat\^orf foundations, <br />stockpiling in the 0-75* zone inane 75-250' zone with <br />that this was allowed on a temnn^®^® u°^i^y^® °*"an notes <br />Wenkus kept silt fence at the eh ‘^asis, and that Mr. <br />period. shoreline during the storage <br />In September and October 1989 ar,.^T4 .. <br />rip rapping Instal Zed at the shor-lln? « boulderwater levels, materials had to Because of the low <br />rather than barged in. This cau^aef^^Jlf^®*!!/” ^and <br />i™’e=d'i/t-er,.“- -p-cr„rtara*dti “d^Vo°"r:/t ‘j: <br />a1.“^"n%“z“Vs:J°?h%“p‘prfc\‘„t^'f linVti;r*c"u/h^Tne‘"o!d'’:!p- <br />in order to eliminate pSddling ii 7=? """"P ”P culvert <br />resulted from silting of the old^t,°r^ . ®°"f®' *^adraising of the grade at the shnr-oi i ‘drainpipe (also due to <br />:he years). ^ ^ shoreline from ice pressure over <br />Zoning Pile #1481 November 17, 1989 Page 2 of 34. In conjunction with lowering that culvert, applicant also regraded the swale in the 0-75' zone to accommodate drainage away from the walk-out door which was constructed to the basement area. •'’his walk-out door was approved by the building inspector on the remodeling plan, but no indication of site grading to accommodate that door was submitted. Staff had no indication that the applicant intended to lower the grade between the door and the shoreline. A door well could easily have been constructed to accommodate that doorway without the need for grading in the 0-75' zone.5. The applicant notes that as part of the original subdivision to create this lot, a swale along the west lot line was required and had been installed in 1975. The grade at the wall in the location of the basement doorway previously was approximately 3' higher and the swale just continued along the west side of the house from the front yard out to the lake. <br />It is staff's opinion that the reduction in grade in the 0- <br />75' within 20' of the shoreline is necessary for drainage <br />maintenance. Any grading work from 20' to the house doorway <br />(about 100' back from the shoreline) was not necessary <br />except to provide gravity drainage away froin the basement <br />door. <br />Discussion - <br />Except for the area of the swale, the lakeshore yard has <br />been restored back to original grades, i.e. the temporary storage <br />fill has been removed and the ruts created by the trucks carrying <br />rip rap boulders, have been refilled and top-dressed. The <br />questions posed to the Planning Commission are two-fold: <br />A) Should a conditional use permit be granted after-the- <br />fact for grading work within 20' of the shoreline to <br />maintain the culvert through the rip rap and the swale, <br />which were required as part of the 1975 subdivision? <br />B) Should the additional depth of swale be allowed to <br />accommodate the basement doorway, or should that area be <br />restored to pre-existing grades and some sort of well/step <br />system be constructed for the doorway, totally in the 75- <br />250' zone? <br />The grade at the basement doorway has been dropped <br />approximately 3'. In the 0-75' zone, the lowering of the grade <br />at the bottom of the swale ranges from just a few Inches to <br />approximately 12 inches to 18 inches at the 75* setback line. <br />} - <br />CT . /A- ^ _ tJ <br />- <br />N
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.