Laserfiche WebLink
®6**° n Date of Notice: 11/22/^9“y, MN 55323 473-73_57_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _1 - - - - - - - - - - - -—---------------------------- TOs Gerry Wenkus LTD.ZONING FILE NO. 1481^CE MJWHIHG COMMISSIOH ACHOE_ *______ 1 ’lid T. McCourtney 15 43rd Ave N <br />aouth, MN 55445 <br />COPIES TO: Gerry3531 Maplewood CirExcelsior# MN <br />------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />--------------------- VOTE! 4 For 0 Against <br />IEBTING: 11/20/89 <br />conmission tocomisenas the follo»l“9- <br />coval subject to conditions noted below <br />g SPECIAL COiromOES: <br />coe-ission te=o.n.end^^^^^ |||er//be'grantel over the swale <br />tererTprop/iate by the city Engineer. <br />,lioanfs nett scheduled meeting is confirmed as^^^ ^ ^ ^ <br />,y council Monday, Deoenber 11, 19»’! commission <br />1 by tL Planning Commission. <br />MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 20, 1989ZONING PILE #1465-MCCOORTNEY CONTINUEDsame location as proposed but it would have a straight configuration rather than curved.Chairman Kelley asked whether the applicant had explored the possibility of a 3.5' high fence?Mr. Wenkus indicated that it would be more appropriate to construct the iron fence at the height proposed.Chairman Kelley asked whether lu was the applicant's intention to plant arborvitae along the fence?Mr. Wenkus said that they would be planting shrubbery and trees in the entire front yard and on either side of the fence. Mr. Wenkus said that the fence would also limit trespassing.There were no comments from the publio regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. <br />Planning Commissioner Brown said that normally he would not <br />look favorably at a 6' fence and would prefer to see the standard <br />3.5' height. Brown said that a 6' fence had previously existed <br />in this location and the proposed fence would be less obtrusive. <br />Planning Commissioner Hanson indicated that he did not <br />object to the height of the fence. <br />Planning Commissioner Bellows said that the Planning <br />Commission normally does not vote favorably for such request. <br />She felt that this proposal was appropriate however due to the <br />openess of the fence. <br />It was moved by Planning Commission Brown, seconded by <br />Planning Commissioner Hanson, to recommend approval of this <br />height variance for a fence as proposed. Hanson requested that <br />the motion be amended to reflect the new location of the fence <br />due to the denial of the turn-around driveway. Brown amended his <br />motion, Hanson seconded. Kelley said that it was important to <br />note that there was a pre-existing 6' fence on this property. <br />Motion, Ayes=3, Kelley, Nay due to his preference to see a 3.5' <br />fence Motion passed. <br />#1481 GERALD MCCOURTNEY <br />1055 PERNDALE ROAD WEST <br />APTER-THE-PACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMITAARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING 8:40 P.M. TO 8:55 P.N. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />duly noted. <br />Mr. McCourtney was present for this matter, as was Mr. Gerry <br />Wenkus, Mr. McCourtney's contractor. <br />Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron <br />explained how staff had discovered the construction of a basement <br />** 1 <br />ife<i <br />mmmm <br />Se.< <br />-.1 <br />■ ■ '* <br />• • <br />7^ ■ <br />'■'i