Laserfiche WebLink
E.1 ^i !11190.2HDplanninq Conunission Chairman Kelley oiono Planning Commission Members City Administrator BernhardsonHichael P. Ctfron, Rs.t Planning a zoning Admini.trator January Up 1990code/comprehensive Plan Conflicts Needing Future Resolution. . .. .<on Code » romprehensive Plan^ A "r^riveway** 3ls ancomprehensive of three residents, not subjectea%e-rn: ^^Sfc^e-^^g^J^^^d^^n^rs^ei\-.rn* o*nrS^errVk^er“in^’ere“L exce^ssive drivewaysubdivision code rteLidmtia” uKts?‘a <br />Ign standards that state for minimum paved width <br />-3ay width of 50' ^aJ ou?lot for a private <br />The Subdivision Co Subdivision 21 (C)l. <br />iVaT/nfifcl lUSUftihi'two docun-ents. <br />c. r-<t*v*a ng»velopinenfc In'tQn^t Flict Between Zoning code & Cl Y--------------ti <br />;p?/e <br />?-ir^uip* y«S«tTs ^°^a-tiVg>-tb\t ‘S? <br />ltLVV/”eh\\tfon%r{ll^ <br />•‘”*Vx.‘S*v«?ancrrsee of 3/6/86). Theroads require a variance ise revision. It <br />TO: 0'ono Planning CommissionFROM: DSi. w.nd Ruth PartenRE: Bayside Woods SubdivisionI. Proposal - Three Lot SubdivisionWe propose a 3 lot subdivision with road outlot, including an 18 foot wide gravel driveway to the turnaround, and a 14 foot wide gravel driveway to Lots 2 and 3. Lot 1 is arranged to incorporate an alternate septic site as shown.Variance Request j^l - Lot AreaProposed Lots 2 and 3 are 4.3 and 4.4 acres respectively.Lot 1 is 6.0 acres and the proposed road outlot is 2.3 acres.The overall density of this project is 5.6 acres per <br />residence. The unique terrain of the property together with <br />the creation of a 50 foot wide road outlot of 2.3 acres <br />creates a hardship that we feel justifies the granting of a <br />variance. <br />Variance Request #2 - Paving <br />We recognize that at some future date the driveway Outlot <br />could access up to six properties and provide access to <br />three landlociced parcels. <br />The additional cost of bituminous paving for the 1,250 foot <br />long driveway to the turnaround is approximately $23,000. <br />We feel that if paving is a requirement, those costs should <br />be shared by all benefiting parties. Therefore a variance is <br />being requested to waive, for the present time, paving of <br />the driveway. <br />II. .^Mternate #1 - Two Lot Subdivision <br />If a variance for paving is out of the question we propose a <br />two lot subdivision, shown as "Exhibit A". The additional <br />expense of paving the driveway and turnaround make a three <br />lot plan economically impractical. <br />This plan produces two 5 acre plus parcels with no variances <br />required. <br />i <br />--