02-26-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ning File #1470 vember 14, 1989 ge 2 of 3D“a'a"rt 'a^^'Jles^loTh'irf "arke/abmty'lrjhe’c'r"r r" tre^^i'erlj'/oer^ot len5‘i\s"ei?:lot can be credited for meeting °4e®denYuy^r?qu\^^^^^lues -Does the Planning Commission feel comfortable via <-ho standard plat In granting thrSiinaaJy lot aJeSTae" zone?”'’ if no ‘*’®” S-' acres in tne r:.;;;™"’- ■■' “ .■™.;s“ frrr:.s: proposal for an 18' wide gravel road to 2 ana extended 14' gravel driveway to Lots whai- Planning Commission? if not, stardards would Planning Con,missioi; » vir^ an"™ % Commission wishes to recommend approval for lot ariances for the standard proposed three lot nlat "appuca/i ' furt“f"/oi"’?n ‘’’“f ^'^e'?ha"t'w%‘; .'""t” arS varlVn. ^ in thf5 acre ”zone ”requesting looked °oarcel ”f P5°''ide future aooeso to neighboring land- M«ot r,f»d th r “! ia requiring an unusually lengthyoutlot road that subtracts from the overall acreage. ^ o;t-“nat«e ”o? t”he na ”roe^, ‘->c?raphy and -stretched oS ”"arero^n?re-leir ”” - aop-J^^® overall density for the three proposed lots is 5 6 :Jn”fa”u.-l^ot%”i%^-s"t?ndar"d””o ”f-tL”^^^^^ Zoning File #1470 November 14, 1989 Page 3 of 3If Planning Commission feels that these and other appropriate Findings provide a substantial justification to grant the lot ar-?- ariances reques'-ed, such that the precedent-setting aspect wouIq oe minimized, then a recommendation for approval of the proposed plat would be appropriate.On the other hand, if Planning Commission feels that granting tho *ja variance here will ultimately lead to pressure for variances on less unique properties in the 5 acre zone, a PRD concept with three distinct building pads and commo: nsd open space, could be considered.Staff would also note that if a recomrr*endation for approval be forthcoming, the plat would be subject to the standard drainage and utility easements, a drainage easement over the major drainage ravine, park fees, private road easements and covenants, etc. I 7 - —.