Laserfiche WebLink
THE PLANNIW commission meeting NOVEMBER 20,1989„.us replied -ouia^,^Vh“.:■hey were putting in a . ^ just assumed that>d for the building p foundation and the swalebe excavated away irom that a reading with a.sed for drainage. f J“|jitional 6’ to l^’ ire^atird “intgr^^cur It was necessary to [dditional cut near the lake.„„e no consents froo the pub^' = regarding this natter jlic hearing was closed.moved by Chairman Kelley, '^after-the-factsr Hanson, to ’^®'°™|"ash'?p'be°ing the need r° e®‘irrof thfitS« s?je of Jthe ^““hether the City eho“^^..V he could look into that <br />r>io!‘’U^fht=fitroo^nlil”Hrnlon seconded. Motion, <br />ys»0, Moti n passed. <br />6 ROTH PARTEN <br />[db road <br />[°?r£fSu ”^“i’o;=!nr?;rt"?f i«?e"=^Mai lin were <br />etd Mrs. parten were present for this public hearin,.^^^ <br />stant Planning tppr”a?io?“« r°3-lot <br />history regarding tnis awF <br />.0«n Kelley '3 “«r'^“r®ts"‘’“oSrp«tion^would'’end^ the <br />r ‘cfrn''e/”w’ith‘''a° cu“lVd“en«JEVw^”u‘ll serlli Vn I’y' <br />in the back. ?f°,fyoad. Kelley said that the issu <br />.=r;rn^%r\o"ts‘?o^%Ve°ea« ae well. <br />Iced Gaffron to show the Planning Commission <br />sutdlTsion. , <br />< wiener Bellows asked where the septic sys nning Commissioner Beiio <br />ed for Lot still located <br />fron indicated that ^configuration for Lot <br />MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 20, 1989ZONING FILE fl470-PARTEN CONTINDEDKelley observed that if Outlot A were put in with only a 50' easement, Outlot A and Lot 1 will be contiguous.Gaffron suggested creating a more narrow Outlot A.Hanson noted that such a configuation would create "the ultimate flag lot".Bellows indicated that she did not approve of this configuration .Hanson indicated that the land would lend itself well to development with the adjacent property.Bellows suggested the property be developed as a 3-lot PRD with the houses clustered. She said that what the Partens are proposing more closely resembles a conventional subdivision. <br />Mabusth interjected that the Planning Commission's directive <br />to have the septic systems included in the homestead pad with a <br />PRD proposal made it very difficult. <br />Bellows indicated that she would not object to the septic <br />systems being located in a commons area. She said that the <br />septic system location is an item that had to give in order to <br />not have this application be a typical subdivision. <br />Ms. Parten explained that the PRD being proposed is the best <br />that can be done due to the topography of the land. <br />Bellows suggested that perhaps the City has reached a de<7. ee <br />of development where a certain amount of acreage no longer <br />guarantees a certain amount of lots. <br />Ms. Parten said that she was frustrated because she could <br />not understand how there could be 50 acres in an area that will <br />not sustain 4 lots. <br />Chairman Kelley asked Bellows for her opinion regarding the <br />2-lot subdivision proposal he suggested with the 2 outlets. <br />Bellows replied that she was uncomfortable with the overall <br />shape of the subdivision and the location of the alternate septic <br />site for Lot 2. <br />Planning Commissioner Brown observed that lot area variances <br />would be required for two of the three lots being proposed. <br />Mabusth suggested that it would not be difficult to make <br />unique findings that would still allow denial of other less <br />unique applications seeking lot area variances for newly created <br />lots. Mabusth said that the extension of the road and the <br />inclusion of the Styles property placed restrictions on the <br />development of the parcel. Mabusth said that an area variance <br />\\\ <br />" ;