Resolution 6552 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

� 1 -r-rt Li 11 y OF RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. � 5 5 (g) The church use including signage at this location will continue to be consistent with the character of the surrounding area. (h) The church use including signage at this location will continue to be consistent with the character of the surrounding area. (i) The church use including the proposed signage is not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses. (j) The proposed landscaping will add to the visual appearance of the proposed signage which does not require buffering or screening. (k) The proposed use of the sign includes limiting the frequency of message changes so that rapidly changing messages will not be a distraction to drivers, and the automatic dimming feature of the sign will ensure that excess glare and light pollution is avoided. (1) The proposed use will not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access. The proposed sign will have no impact on traffic levels or parking. (m) The sign is intended to match the architectural styling of the church and is not anticipated to have any environmental impacts. (n) The automatic dimming feature of the sign message board will ensure that excess glare and light pollution is avoided. The back -lighting of the signage outside the message board is not anticipated to cause glare. (o) The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance and CUP on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 7. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance and CUP would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the Page 4 of 6