02-12-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

slops before a future have the opportunity to Reiersgord will not own tin an additional 10' forblot segment will serve future lot. This segment ^ a private driveway, not a and utility easement to er the driveway can be rovided. If not, Lot 1 , or the outlot could be .re code standards would emergency vehicle turn- ng driveway length. sd now? What part should Is? : requiring that private Lvisions reach a certain jsitive change in policy, rs. on the subdivision code 4' paving, "more than 7" defined.) Does the poor I of the other 2, who will subdivision that should t the 4 unit level, or at f the subdivision code to line rearrangement with id utility easement over ? should logically take a ince it will ultimately it with subdivision code Note that the recently : accessability to private easements, would have to f he so desired, with no Zoning File #1470 January 10, 1990 Page 4 of 6If Outlot A was to exclude the northerly 20* wide section, makina that part Outlot B, the 20' strip might be considered a private drivlway serving only 1, possibly 2, houses =erve asmerely a private driveway without the strict requirement for underlying road and utility easement.The preliminary plat drawings show that the easement serving Reiersgord’s property is to be While this would be a logical proposal, agrees to such a release, no information has been suggest that that property owner is willing to release hiseasement.Additional Discussion -AS noted at your last meeting, the property J^®north Lve stated that they do not feel an access to Bayside Road is necessary to serve their properties, and they be1 Yhave leaal access across the Luce Line to Turnham Road. The city has no obligation to provide access for these P^®P®^^y and ?he current applicant does not propose to provide them with access. A brief review of the White property to the south suggests that it might be feasible to subdivide that Outlot A. Of course, there is no guarantee that White would want ?o develop using Partens' Outlot A. A short conceivably be developed to serve White s acreage with road system from Bayside Road. The applicants have provided a 15' wide over the ravine in Lot 1, since blockage of that ravine could affect drainage of properties to the west. City Engineer's Recommendation - The City Engineer in reviewing this ®^f^®this that under the most comprehensive approach to d®v®i®P^®"^/” area, the entire length of Outlot A should be 50 wi^®' should be extended to serve the properties to the northwest, and shoul be totally upgraded to a paved standard either now j _ 3?d housing unit is built (which could be by further subdivision of Lot 1 or by construction on Reiersgord's property) or y construction on White's property. fcs-'^ ■ /O