Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />^ . <br />To:Planning Conuaission Chaiman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardscn <br />From:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Date:January 11/ 1990 <br />Subject: Code/Comprehensive Plan Conflicts Needing rutura <br />Resolution <br />rnn^licn 3ef./een Subdivision Code & Comprehensive Plan <br />of mere than one user or where mere is excessive d-i/evay <br />length. <br />The Subdivision Code (not the Zoning code) provides private <br />liaht-of i!ay ^^idlfof Jo'^Is® VeVuir°9d,' wl th^ a”Lni^‘^*pa ved'widt.h <br />of 2^. Th. subdivision code requires an outl^ for a prxvate <br />road serving 3 or more lots [Section 11.10, Subaivision ^1 (C)J. <br />Clearly, there is a conflict between these two documents. <br />Conflict Between Zoning Code S Citv's Develocment Inten_trnMmmimm <br />e-xtracolating of* definitions, all newly created <br />on a public street, therefore new Procose_d to --ont^ <br />pri-ite roads require a variance (see MPG memo or 3/6/36). *he <br />d--- nitions for lot standards seem in dire need or revision. x. <br />ir--e City's clear intent that development with private roads is <br />appropriate,To do so should not require variances. <br />I