Laserfiche WebLink
n - The applicant has been present ateu.er =: If Councilhas been a seriesbsenses._e _ (rhis has been done abled on ^ ^^^^^^J^pl?ffPeven\fter an Initial I for approvals and a review this was'J°£or%nlal '‘f^.S^funotion f th the Ferrell! as ?%3 ’i®a\e as th^s past September with t.ication and as iate a 5h Burgess application.A .. Tn ^ases where the Not listed on .SS-Sm-j.'ce of" the agenda thatrrcan-tTias e not be able to be <br />lenTIhey Vave ”Ist not been placed on the agenda. <br />act been Instances when the^applicant^has^^^^ <br />at the item has not change in plans in advance <br />,t has Indicated ® u^s^usually waited until <br />>ilf.ig“aVtef fn^^tll? ^n/lcI?FoV o£ denial Include <br />ng applications. <br />Gregory <br />Beldin/Meline <br />Curtis <br />Palm <br />Burgess <br />Pillsbury <br />Jllson/Stodola <br />rton <br />plication is "the Yg’ef afd^\'a"d°Iuf e\u?f “tabl.lngs <br />fiVafio\Tfas ‘?i«A;''tdopted on the original <br />;mber this past summer. <br />: the issue as f "frthS'’«tor«^ <br />I'lhri^e If "bufd^fily Clear that^t^^^^ <br />lot out of sync, but could be impro allowing <br />{H-^?ly'^\efe‘I'fn^^^"^^ f^ * <br />he manner^n wnich that is granted. <br />ALTERNA^VES -Issue #2-0rdinance Revision -1. Leave as is.2. Amend to clarify.3. Amend to incorporate new procedureIssue #3-PracticeA. Two step denial procedure.1. Leave as is.2. Amend Lo have a uniform motion for Step 1 followed by <br />Step 2. <br />3. Take no action. <br />B. Authorization for tabling <br />1. Take no action. <br />2. Allow tabling at the request of the individual. <br />3. Set a time limit on it. <br />4. Table only on Council action, not on the consent agenda. <br />RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the ordinance (as it is a <br />zoning ordinance requiring substantial publication notice) not be <br />amended at this time, but should there be a recodification, that <br />this be adopted. As for practice it is recommended that a <br />uniform motion be adopted for Step 1 that being directing staff <br />to prepare a denial resolution. As for tabling it is recommended <br />that the City continue to allow its policy of allowing tabling at <br />the applicant's request but that a time limit of say, 60 days, be <br />placed on that so that they do not continue forever. <br />PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by that the Council <br />accepts the information and directs staff to have a uniform <br />motion of directing staff to prepare a denial resolution for any <br />intended denials and staff can, if there is going to be tabling, <br />that it be placed on the agenda as aconsent or an action item but <br />that prior to expiration of 60 days the denial resolution either <br />has to be acted on or referred back to Planning Commission for an <br />amended review. Ayes _, Nays _. <br />cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator <br />Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Admin.