Laserfiche WebLink
11590.2Mayor and City Council: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrati: January 12, 19902CT: Navarre - Master Planning <br />:hment;A. Navarre Memo Dated 11/21/89 <br />B. Navarre Memo Dated 6/21/89 <br />C. Navarre Memo Dated 10/18/89 <br />■lik°e®\o''tiUp^^°"^^ the Council as to what direction they liKe to take as it relates to the Navarre area. ^ <br />DUCTION - The Council held a meeting in June to review the <br />na^a'^oMhi by Dahlgren, Shardlow and Uban together with <br />^^s'foUo'lVr'’"®"‘ ^ outlined <br />“ the°°arl/rl/aiJrng?°°“ further at thle <br />a. Aesthetic look of the area <br />b. Land use <br />^0''e™ber 18, 1989 meeting that <br />lebruary ti„,e“trame. - <br />matter ^^ desires to do anything further with thismatter staff would notify, as was indicated at the <br />residents in attendance that this item <br />February* agenda for its second meeting in <br />tl’’appr‘oLh° at what level <br />a. Master plan of land use <br />b. Comprehensive Plan amendment <br />c. Any applicable rezonings <br />informal discussion following the November <br />18th meeting was that the City should go through a <br />i<3®"tify what it would like in the future, <br />but that It would not take any active role in it. <br />for master planning in the land use and if possible submission of a comprehensive plan amendment. It would orobably not be appropriate at this time to undertake any attendant rezonings until there was an interest in redevelopment of the property by the private owner.In October the Council did authorize an extension of the contract as noted on Attachment C Dahlgren, Shardlow and Uban has been asked to estimate the cost of completing the master planning process. This will be presented to Council at its next meeting. (The staff is also reviewing the need for an update to its comprehensive plan in light of the recent Metro Council requirements. It is not anticipated at this time that the staff will not be having much need for outside help.)Issue #3. If the City has gone forward on ^1 and #2 does it <br />desire to undertake any active ste;i to assist in making the <br />changes happen. <br />a. Market to private businesses <br />b. Assemble land <br />c. Undertake public financing <br />There did not seem to be any interest in having <br />governmental participation active in implementing any of <br />the desired changes. <br />Perhaps the only level of participation in improvement <br />is the beautification plan and perhaps local assistance <br />for that. <br />ALTERNATIVES - <br />1. Indicate level of interest in undertaking master planning. <br />2. Establishment of further consideration at the February 26, <br />1990 Council meeting. <br />3. Table for further discussion. <br />4. Indicate no desire to go any further. <br />RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council table the <br />matter until its February 12, 1990 meeting if it is interested in <br />undertaking the master planning process. <br />PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by that the Council <br />having indicated its desire in further exploring master planning <br />table the issue until February 12, 1990, to review the cost. <br />Ayes _, Nays _. <br />cc:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator <br />John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director <br />John Shardlow/Ed Hassek, Dahlgren, Shardlow & Uban <br />! I <br />* m <br />......... <br />• :: ■ .^1 <br />^ ;v u#' <br />wmM gli <br />■ 0'f <br />■-'Sliiiagi* <br />-■■ <br />’■0r <br />Mm <br />mm