Laserfiche WebLink
city of Orono jghematteTask• ^*'*®*Proonm/Spac®NttdiBuilding Spact _Wanning OptlonaWanning Optlona___J <br />building Daaign <br />mageStudlaa <br />fy Revlawa <br />Aitooteift, fne.13090.4Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat DATE: January 30, 1990SUBJECT: Navarre Area Master Planning 'n,!,’. wKr' fi*!! ff;312 m r-oAttachment: A. Navarre Area Master Planning Memo Dated 1/12/90B. Shardlow Memo Dated 2/8/90ISSUE - <br />1. Presentation to the Council of the estimated cost to complete <br />master planning in the Navarre area. <br />2. Determination by Council as to whether they want to proceed <br />with a master plan and if so, setting a date for consideration at <br />which the interested public would be invited. <br />INTRODUCTION - At the Council's last meeting Attachment A <br />summarized some of the information from the November 18, 1989 <br />meeting and based on the direction indicated that Council would <br />table until this meeting for further exploration of the master <br />planning concept of the area based on estimated cost. <br />DISUCSSION - As noted in Attachment A the City had budgeted <br />$30,000 in 1988 and '89 and has budgeted an additional $7,500 in <br />1990. Of that $37,500 total, the City has spent about $18,500. <br />As outlined in Attachment B the cost of doing a master plan <br />process would be about $9,700 with the text for a comprehensive <br />plan amendment an additional $2,500. The total for the master <br />plan would bring the total to $28,200, still within the amount <br />budgeted . <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />1. Determine to proceed. <br />2. Choose not to proceed any further. <br />3. Table for further discussion. <br />4. Establish public informational meeting on the issue. <br />March 12, 1990 <br />March 24, 1990 <br />April 9, 1990 <br />RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council hold in <br />informational meeting to undertake a master planning on March 12, <br />1990. The cost is within the amount budgeted for Navarre but <br />would require a $2,200 budget amendment for 1990.