My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-12-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
02-12-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/23/2024 1:31:11 PM
Creation date
8/23/2024 1:21:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
422
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />price. While it varies from year to year, a person who does <br />a bathroom improvement may realize 75% of their investment <br />where someone who puts in a pool may realize only 20% of <br />their investment at the sale price. <br />Lateral Options - The two areas were offered the option of <br />extending laterals providing they pay for the assessment. <br />The questions was if they do not have a lateral the City can <br />prove the market benefit. <br />Should sufficient numbers not indicate an interest in doing <br />the trunk only, the City may in fact do the lateral and <br />assess the trunk and put a connection charge for the lateral <br />portion of it thereby better insuring it would get its full <br />value. <br />City contribution ~ For nine out of the last ten projects <br />each project has had to pay for its own sewer. The exception <br />has been in the Crystal Bay area. The direction to date has <br />been that the predominent policy would prevail and that this <br />area should expect to pay the full amount of the project. <br />Other funding sources - To the best of our knowledge there <br />are no other funding sources that are available. The City is <br />willing, however, to finance this over a 15 to 20 year <br />period, both the assessment and any connection charges the <br />City may charge. <br />Who is providing the momentum for this project? Is it the <br />residents? While the City had in is Comprehensive Plan in <br />1980 identified this area as an area for sewering the primary <br />imputus has been from the neighborhood for those people who <br />have failed or failing systems. As such, it will be up to <br />the residents themselves to decide it they want this project <br />to go ahead or not.•<
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.