02-12-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

6. Determine Number of Appeal s - The appeal period after the adoption of special assessment is 30 daysr once that has lapsed no further appeals can be made, if the notification has been given in that time period.7. Ordering the Project - Based on the appeals the City can then diTermine whether it desires to have the project ordered or not.8. Project Construction - Then the necessary contracts and financial arrangement can be done.IVES -- Summary of meeting questions and responses.A. Accept. B. Comment. C. Suggest policy or change direction. - Process. A. Undertake process as proposed. B. Utilize the Crystal Bay "Process" C. Develop a different process. D. Take no action. E. Stop the project consideration. i' i n t 13190.(CTPJSUMMARY OF QUESTIONS - STUBBS BAY SEWER MEETI!DATED 1/30/90Following are major questions and responses to those questions from the last meeting. Further significant questions included the following;1. Why are certain areas included in the project and other areas excluded?A. Two acre - There are certain two acre properties that are included in the project because of their proximity to the availablilty for sewer. Specifically those in the Stubbs Bay north area. This is in part due to decisions as to the project area made several years ago, when this area was identified together with the proximity for service. Other two acre areas such as Sussex will not be included and it becomes an issue of where the demarcation is made. The area for Oxford could be included because of the lakeshore (however it was indicated by a resident of the Oxford area that at the present time six to eight residents are opposed to doing it.) B. What about inclusion of 2 houses to the east of Leaf Street? DATION - It is recommended that the Council having made ents or had any further questions regarding the summary he information. Issue #2 - It is recommended to table consideration until 2/26. Further information on financial support by the City on prior projects and a draft letter to residents will be presented. MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that the Council reviewed the information table to Febraury 26, 1990 Ayes , Nays __. nn Cook, City Engineer n R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director nne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator hael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Admin. There are two houses that are served by a private drWeway further east on Leaf Street, staff is presently exploring whether they should be included based on their septic availability. Cygnet Place - Presently Cygnet does not require service as the failings in any septic systems have been corrected. The inclusion of this, however, in the project would not substantially lower the cost of the project in Stubbs Bay. Any purchase of capacity for that future development would by the same rational require the people in Stubbs Bay to pay a portion of the capacity on Tonkawa and have those rebated so that in effect it may not be to any gain to those in the area. Additionally Cygnet will be an expensive place to sewer because of the existing topography. There were comments regarding the specific design and