02-12-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

jview Exhibit N, the hardcover facts between the 75-applicant. Staff has reviewed the updated (libit Q) and has made an adjustment for the gravel . Staff determined 1,630.7 s.f. of hardcover for area as opposed to 1,346 s.f. originally presented Total hardcover within the 75-250’ setback zone is o 28.3% with an excess now of 3.3% hardcover within tback zone.cant has submitted photos for the Council's review the impact of the elevation of the 6' high privacy lew windows of the residence to the norch. Please t P, Mr. Hommeyer has submitted an update on the ssue with the DNR confirming that an after-the-fact n issued by the DNR as of November 30, 1989.Ion Available to the Council -f wall (2'9" high, runs approx. 30+ lineal feet, :and side of lakeshore sand blanket). If deniedapplicant for a more acceptable form of 5ntrol for lake side bank or, if approved, finding•d of erosion control to be acceptable and the height and materials to be of a design and color .nto the natural screening of lakeshore bank. airs. Approval finding the existing lakeshore -o meet informal standards of City for lakeshore steep access banks. lakeshore deck within 0-75’ setback area. IS proposed; or led on the following findings: PP*^oVal of such a structure within the lakeshore feted area would be inconsistent with previous il actions. pproval of this structure would provide a negative dent in review of future similar applications. Zoning File #1467 Feburary 6, 1990 Page 7 3. Applicant has failed to demonstrate suitable or adequate hardships to allow the deck in the present location. Council should be prepared to advise applicant if they would allow the deck to be relocated in front of the average lakeshore setback 1*ne and out of the 75' setback area. If so, applicant must be prepared to reduce existing hardcover with n the 75- 250' setback area to allow the increase of H.17 s.f. of additional hardcover. Applicant should Lo asked to provide an updated survey relocating deck and reflecting removals of existing hardcover within the 75-250’ setback zone for your February 26th meeting.D. Privacy fence (6' high along the shared lot lines of Lots 2 and 3 running approx. 30' in front of the average setback line). Denial finding applicant has not demonstrated adequate hardship for the variance; orApproval based on the following findings: 1. At the proposed elevation, the 6' high fence will have no negative impact on the lakeshore views of the view windows of the existing residence to the north. 2. The location of the patio area on the lakeside of applicant's residence and the tram on the adjacent property to the north necessitates a view and noise barrier. Council Action - To provide staff with conceptual direction so that an appropriate resolution can be drafted for Council's action at their February 26th meeting. If an average lakeshore setback variance is approved for a relocated deck area, applicant must provide an amended site plan showing new location of deck and portions of existing hardcover to be removed. Council should provide applicant with guidelines for the amount of hardcover to be removed (refer to Exhibits M & N).