Laserfiche WebLink
property or immediately adjoining property. <br />Response: Yes. The adjoining property also required a variance to be built. <br />9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which <br />said land is located. <br />Response: No, the adjoining properties also need a variance to be constructed. <br />10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right of the applicant. <br />Response: Yes. The existing deck was needing significant repairs and will be rebuilt with the same <br />intent to use for seating and grilling. <br />11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, <br />comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. <br />Response: Correct <br />12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant <br />but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. <br />Response: Yes. The existing deck was rotting out and needed to be repaired immediately as it was a <br />safety issue. So the variance would need to be granted to do the necessary repairs as well as allow for <br />the expansion. <br />7/18/24, 4:13 PM Permit Details | Citizenserve <br />https://www3.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetail&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=51051916&WorkOrder_ID=886…2/214