Laserfiche WebLink
LM'.’CC t1inut:<sH <br />t>aye Two - December 19, i969 <br />ror tne lebruary tuli Cotnmisaxon and System Evaluation. That <br />n “u':rTonL “’bav C,.«b*ra <br />^ ^ ^ ^ scheuules witn tlie <br />Exoeisior. With no oommenta. Watts stated she would send <br />the st-hedule out to members and cities in the next packet. <br />Watts reminded the Committee the 1990 budget would go into efteot <br />the lust oL January. Tne budget received appr oval^ti om all <br />communities on the Commission. Additionally, Watts noted a vear-ei.d <br />sysuem iitatUii repui l would be dratted and eent to Tn - • t <br />r...., „.rvic.. .no gr... revenue. £or th. Snii;,'.' <br />tiguxes wo«jld be an indicaUoi as to the amount oi iranchise tees tu <br />be leceived by the Commission by March 31, 1990. <br />Subscriber complaints leceived by the Commission otiice lor the <br />months ol November ami becemoer numbered three, includinu a loiiow- <br />up call trom a poteficial subscriber on an install date. Watts <br />stated the evaluation process would address the issue ot inlormation <br />provided to subscribers regarding the complaint process! <br />Watts said no new information was available on the issue of soace <br />reciaimation at ECC. cine noted the Minnetonka School District's <br />uar! Uiiectors would be making a decision on the matter Jan- <br />uaX y o• <br />UpdisLes un itema fiom x<mt month's meeting included: <br />A tuur to Waseca would be arranged tor March 20, it that can be <br />CO,.With Tti.,. Th. co,t o£ chartering . .otirJLch“ou!d <br />oot^it. would b. April 17. Ti.. £or tr.v.l ... <br />Eeyarding the possible system upgrade mentioned at the last <br />meeting by Ric Hanson, Watts said she had reviewed the ordinance <br />that addressed the issue of upgrades and stated they were subject to <br />toi!** P*^^^esses in place by the Commission. Some discussion <br />comments, and it was stated that Triax should inform <br />the commission when it was ready to propose system changes. <br />Watts made available sample newsletters she had developed for use in <br />^hrnui?f communities and instiLtionl, <br />the public in general with regard to the access facilities and <br />activities. The newsletter could be sent to approximately 140 <br />groups/indiv.i.duals each quarter for an annual coat of «140. The <br />members agre id the newsletter was a good idea and felt there would <br />be aufixcxent funds for mailing. <br />I !