My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-22-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
01-22-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2024 2:16:42 PM
Creation date
8/16/2024 10:59:50 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
716
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
M—ClMniiasMn. EmWw^Shwmiaod Sarfor—WM.. Jan. X1990Committee refines fuel thut will drive luke d 1Bv Parker Hodccs i-i.. _• .... JlBy Parker HodgesSweeping changes in the management of Lake Minnetonka are under way, with the Lake Minnetonka Management Plan scheduled for unveiling in the spring.The hid that will drive the management plan to fruition is currently being reflned by the Intergovernmental Relations <br />Subcommittee of the Lake Min <br />netonka Conservation District <br />■LMCD). which is conducting <br />the plan. <br />That fuel consists of the <br />money needed to make the pro <br />gram work. The proposals being <br />discussed in the plan call for in <br />creased regulation and control <br />over many areas of the lake. <br />In order to implement the <br />plan’s proposals, more money <br />fo r die LMCD than currently ex <br />ists is required, according to <br />Dave Amdorfer who is conduc <br />ting the study for the LMCD. <br />The plan calls for some <br />sweeping changes in how the <br />l^e is managed, including limiting ui-lake dock slips, increasing the Hennepin County Sheriffs Water Patrol presence, s^fening enforcement of en- vironmMtal regulations, and controlling on-shoredeveiopmoit.Creating the plan, scheduled for LMCD ratification in this spring, is only the first phase. It <br />has identified areas that need <br />streamlinuig and clearer <br />outlina of enforcement respon <br />sibilities, and has developed <br />some proposals on how to cor <br />rect them. <br />But as developing the plan hits <br />the homestreach, the two major <br />hurdles that need to be cleared <br />are coming into focus. The first <br />is to get the cooperation of the <br />agencies that re^te parts of <br />the lake. The second may te the <br />most important: money. <br />Currently the LMCD gets a <br />majority of its budget from con <br />tributions from the 14 cities that <br />border the lake. It also gets <br />some money from licenses and <br />fees, and grants from the state and federal governments.Hennepin County provides public safety through the Sheriffs Water Patrol and maintenance of channels and buoy placement through its Public Works department.In exchange for the contribu tions. the 14 cities each have an LMCD board representative. <br />But when the LMCD s In <br />tergovernmental Relations Sub <br />committee makes its final <br />report m the next month, aU that <br />may change. <br />TTie subcui .mittee’s <br />preliminary report is looking at <br />how to increase the LMCD's fun <br />ding in order to give it the <br />resources to better control all <br />aspects of lake management, <br />said Arndorfer. <br />Several possibilities are being <br />discussed. They include a <br />metro-wide boat sticker “for <br />boats used in water bodies <br />around the metro area.” said <br />Minnetonka Mayor Larry <br />Donlin, who has regularly at <br />tended the suteommittee <br />meetinp. <br />But a specific boating sticker <br />for an area of the state has traditionally met opposition from the Department oi NaturalResources. said JerryRockvam. Spring Park mayor and regular attendee at the meetings.Rockvam said he thinks a Hennepin County tax makes more sense. “If the LMCD is trying to broaden its scope and <br />bMome a regional agency a <br />broader base of funding is need <br />ed.” he said. <br />Donlin agreed, but said he <br />would support a three-tier tax <br />ing system. Riparian, or <br />lakeshore. homeowners should <br />be taxed the heaviest, with <br />homeowners in a r^awn <br />LMCD boundary taxed at a <br />lower level, and then the rest of <br />the county taxed at a still-lower <br />rate. <br />What next? <br />The Intergovernmental Rela <br />tions subcommittee is scheduled <br />to hold its final meeting beginn <br />ing at 7 p.m. Thursday, Jan. 18 <br />at Tonka Bay Village Hall, 4901 <br />Manitou Road. <br />Any funding changes sought <br />by the LMCD will require ap proval by the Legislature, in eluding a metro-wide - boat sticker or a new taxing district.Donlin said that the LMCD needs to be strengthened if it is to survive as a viable management agency for the next 20-25 years. The main obstacle, he said, is the sense ot <br />“parochialism ” among the lake <br />communities. <br />"The communities are goin^ <br />to have to give up some of theii <br />authority. If they resist the Mel <br />Council can recommend to U h <br />Legislature that the LMCD be <br />disbanded,” Donlin said. <br />Rockvam said that some lake <br />area mayors have not been <br />regularly attending the In <br />tergovenunentol Relations Sub <br />committee meetings and in <br />some cases have not been there <br />at all. <br />He said that those cities may <br />not want to give the LMCD anv <br />more power than it currently <br />has, but that that thinking may <br />be a mistake. “Those dties <br />should be represented because <br />what is being discussed is <br />serious stuff," he said.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.