Laserfiche WebLink
in the line that someone:e not be excess capacity a use?nut in according to ,um diameter line that can obviouslyuirements «ould be enj in':; „ore than the and utilize thisess could be hooked i o£ having a. Staff has discussed t ^ picked up by the3f the cost of the ^^o eventually be fundedLtially as a reserve ^^,i3 ,s..ho may use the pip • as reserve5100,000 that approximately $1,000 <br />ouJ-d reduce the ^ should be remerabere <br />t based on 100 "YY;^\^^king into the line on <br />, that this area -reserve capacity for <br />Road (CO. Rd. 135) w i people along <br />ea and for em and there is no <br />■ f;„"Jrth:J^ouir:r;eha;vd anythin, as a result <br />been the City's . 3“ becaust rou ”n"ow “ave an <br />-rslnu “y-dis:::^ -^you .evi^^^^ - ^ <br />E you Choose not to up in the study areatt -rm:"tVoor:r«Vth^"^.r:;ntL and .y tor the <br />u • <br />, be changed to help us attord the i.pro,emen« <br />his area was fn thi°ar%a\ This was <br />because there was "°t * not have sewer, <br />in other areas o£ the „oe installed In <br />the crystal Bay ntea. Th „eUent "“t ^ny <br />there has been no requ Id be <br />w ritv to rezone tha ^ y q£re by the ^ i acre standards, ^ <br />t even if rezone -rea would remain subs . -*• * <br />in the crystal Bay at the City would <br />request for Alzc, to the extent <br />,mend its Comprehensive P . <br />that individual properties were looking for additional hookups that would help decrease the overall unit charge but that property would then have to pay for more units.8. Will a new subdivision, such as the one being proposed eastof Leaf Street, be included in the project?It has not been the policy of the City to include any areas that do not absolutely need sewer. This area is developing to a 2 acre standard and preliminary indications are that it will have adequate conditions for on-site septic systems on each building site. Even if the City were to allow sewering of this area, the topography of the area would require significant design parameters that would not result in a <br />substantial reduction ir. unit lateral cost for the Stubbs Bay <br />project. Inclusion of all those units in the project may <br />reduce the trunk cost by about 20%. (100 units in Stubbs Bay <br />22, units in "Sussex") <br />9. Why is the property on Oxford Road being left out? <br />Again, this area was developed to the 2 acre standard and <br />although it is lakeshore property which differentiates it <br />from the property east of Leaf, it is not contemplated to be <br />included as there should be adeguate septic systems for this <br />area. Based on general City policy we have not addressed <br />this question to the Council but we will address both this <br />and the question regarding the subdivision. The inclusion of <br />the Oxford property would probably reduce the trunk cost by <br />about 10%. (10 properties) <br />10. How soon could a project be undertaken? <br />The project progress is dependent on the level of interest of <br />the neighborhood. If substantial interest is generated this <br />fall and hearings could be held this winter, plans could be <br />drawn this winter and construction begun in the spring. It <br />is important to realize that the Council will probably not <br />undertake this project unless a substantial majority of the <br />property owners are interested in undertaking this project to <br />the point of agreeing to sign a waiver of appeal on this <br />project. This is a neighborhood problem, and the <br />neighborhood should get together to decide how they want to <br />solve it. (It was mentioned that the current prices are as