Laserfiche WebLink
� o� <br /> O > O CITY of ORONO <br /> �;��. - ,� <br /> � � ,-� � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> �� ���� �� No. 6 1 5 3 <br /> L`�kESH�g'� <br /> a. The property contains 7,205 square feet in area and has a lot width of 50 feet. <br /> The existing property including the after-the-fact enclosed porch is <br /> conforming with respect to lot coverage at 919 s.f. where 1500 s.f. is allowed. <br /> b. The Property is within the 250-500' hardcover zone where 30% hardcover is <br /> allowed. Existing hardcover on the property including the enclosed porch and <br /> associated grade-level deck is 29.24%,just below the 30% limit. <br /> c. The enclosed porch as constructed is located 7 feet from the side property line <br /> where a setback of 10 feet from the side property line is normally required. A <br /> grade-level deck newly constructed alongside the enclosed porch meets the <br /> pertinent setback requirements. <br /> d. The enclosed porch was constructed over a pre-existing grade-level deck. The <br /> pre-existing deck was at the main floor level and would be allowed as close as <br /> 2 feet from the side lot line per Code Section 78-1405(3). Enclosure of the <br /> conforming deck to make it into a porch requires that the porch meet the 10' <br /> setback. <br /> e. The enclosed porch as constructed continues in line with the side wall of the <br /> existing house and will not encroach any nearer the lot line than the existing <br /> house. <br /> f. Addition of a screen porch to this very small house is not an unreasonable <br /> request. The fact that the existing house is closer to the side lot line than the <br /> Code allows is a practical difficulty. The existing jog along the back wall of <br /> the house would act to limit the width of a conforming screen porch extension <br /> to approximately 7 feet. Further, the existing roofline of the house would <br /> make it difficult or impossible to maintain reasonable headroom in an <br /> enclosed porch if it had to be moved further north along the rear walls of the <br /> house. <br /> g. The addition does not appear to limit the light, air and open space enjoyed by <br /> the adjacent property. The house to the immediate south is approximately 50 <br /> feet from applicant's side lot line. The applicant's request results in minimal <br /> negative impact to adjacent properties. The location of the existing home and <br /> the size of the property are a unique circumstance not created by the applicant. <br /> Granting the applicant's request is in harmony with the purpose and intent of <br /> the ordinance and will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br />