My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 6119
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 6100 -6199 - December 12, 2011 - January 14, 2013
>
Resolution 6119
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2015 11:25:43 AM
Creation date
10/26/2015 11:25:43 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� O� <br /> O �� O CITY of ORONO <br /> �._= <br /> � ,,, �, <br /> �! � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> �'� �� :; �,�� No. 6 1 1 9 <br /> ��kESHOg'� <br /> 4. The Property is only 49 feet wide which makes expansion of the home within required <br /> setbacks difficult. <br /> �. The prominent lakeshore for properties in this neighborhood is south of County Road 51 <br /> (North Shore Drive), which dictates that garages are best located on the northern portion <br /> of properties to allow for maximization of lake views from within the home. <br /> 6. The Property is a double frontage lot, and the proposed attached garage on the northern <br /> part of the home is closer to Balder Park Road than the County Road, so the proposed <br /> driveway connection to Balder Park Road will limit overall hardcover necessary for <br /> driveway purposes while simultaneously eliminating a private access point onto the <br /> County Road in accordance with general access management guidelines. <br /> 7. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on February <br /> 21, 2012 and unanimously recommended approval of the requested variances based on <br /> the following findings: <br /> a. Residential use of the Property is appropriate given the existing use, the <br /> comprehensive plan and zoning allowances. <br /> b. The request to expand the existing home to a size allowed by code within allowable <br /> setbacks is a reasonable proposal that would otherwise be prohibited by official <br /> controls as the resulting hardcover is prohibited. <br /> c. The Applicants were not responsible for the location of the existing home or the <br /> grossly nonconforming lot width of the Property which together dictate how and <br /> where the existing dwelling can be expanded. <br /> d. The use of the Property will not be changing and therefore will not alter the essential <br /> character of the locality. <br /> e. The Applicants are not proposing to construct the proposed additions solely for <br /> economic considerations. <br /> £ The small width of the lot, the location of the prominent lakeshore on the primary <br /> street-side of the home, the presence of duel 0' — 75' zones on the northern and <br /> southern portions of the lot, and the fact that the Property is a double frontage lot aze <br /> unique circumstances differentiating the Property from others within the City of <br /> Orono. <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.