Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />CITY OF ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br />NO. 7498 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />is reasonable to expect some outdoor living space, such as a deck, for a single-family home. The <br />subject property is substandard in size and unable to meet the setback requirements due to the <br />placement of the home on the lot. The proposal is reasonable and unlikely to impact the neighboring <br />properties. This criterion is met. <br /> <br />3. “Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical <br />difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. ‘Practical difficulties,’ as used in connection with <br />the granting of a variance, means that: <br />a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, <br />however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. <br /> <br />The proposal to construct a deck for a single-family home that does not currently have <br />outdoor living space is reasonable. The existing home does not meet the rear yard setback <br />and therefore the construction of a deck requires a setback variance. This criterion is met. <br /> <br />b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the <br />landowner. <br /> <br />The location of the existing home on the lot as well as the substandard size and width of <br />the lot are out of the control of the homeowner. This criterion is met. <br /> <br />c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.” <br /> <br />The proposed variances allowing construction of a new deck on the rear of the home will <br />not alter the character of the locality. The proposed deck will meet the setback from the <br />corner side yard and will be screened from neighboring properties by existing fencing or <br />vegetation. <br /> <br />4. “Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties.” Economic considerations <br />have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br /> <br />5. “Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar <br />energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § <br />216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.” This condition is not <br />applicable. <br /> <br />6. “The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City <br />Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.” This condition <br />is not applicable, as a residential home is a permitted use in the LR-1A District. <br /> <br />45