Laserfiche WebLink
"i /• Vv.-•sm&M>r'f-''t-;mmimm . ;■•.*-i'<p/Irr^'^^vT 4BOARMAN&ASSOCIATESARCHITECTUREengineeringINTERIOR DESIGNE> ncZLZTZBS 8ZTB 0PTZ0V8 <br />OPTZOH 1 OPTZOM 2 OPTZON 3 OPTZOH 4 <br />SITES A SITE A SITE W SITE C <br />city hallPOLICE <br />SITE B <br />PUBLIC <br />WORKS <br />POLICE <br />SITE C <br />PUBLIC <br />WORKS <br />POLICE <br />PUBLIC <br />WORKS <br />POLICE <br />PUBLIC <br />WORKS <br />NONE UNKNOWN none unknown <br />RATION <br />Lon <br />srrection <br />$ 20,000 <br />NONE?ing/Screening $ 25,000 <br />IS <br />$20,000 <br />55,000 <br />NONE <br />NONE <br />$ 20,000 <br />NONE <br />$160,000 <br />40,000 <br />irfaces <br />12,500 <br />279,000 <br />95.150 <br />25,500 <br />147,500 <br />70.250 <br />12,500 <br />135.000 <br />120.000 <br />12,500 <br />12,500 <br />90.000 <br />$422,650 $317,750 $287,500 $315,000 <br />REPARATION <br />ost inpact for Sites A 6 B is Utilities M5m mnn /• « « <br />OERATIONS HAVING UNDEFINED COST IMPACTS. <br />: COSTS <br />CitJ^f?JSSifSr2.Yi^i} increase as theBuilding and the Public Works <br />Building would not be constructed siaultaneor <br />»•Construct the Public Works Building on site <br />" ' l|t..........................TBr ........•ji|||B <br />mrmmyyI- <br />myyMX'i <br />p3 ''-’mym^mfeMasii <br />yy. . <br />We - 3 <br />11*%: V ^m m'i>a <br />•~'3,v.; <br />m <br />wm: a <br />Milii <br />™jiii|y i|K|Pp3. ; <br />: ,:^v- <br />M <br />•^lli <br />ii-%1 <br />E Eyy ■% <br />if'EE:-■ rE-EE.t:'E <br />WM mmmmsmm333-3;:r.\;f'^iX:r ,3?;l!i«iiSii'immmm t1^'.Eymyiyyy <br />rf'EEE.;:E- <br />:y y:/ ".'" <br />i'iii^fS <br />... <br />P wm:-- Eyy <br />i'ftV BBISSyto^Siyi^ <br />r■vU <br />E - <br />f ■ ; ■>:! ■ <br />MMi&EWm <br />3 .i'-3i..?-'S:;i!iii <br />y33«3r;;:;3 -:::,.;« <br />mmtEJmy E§mm <br />'is*^' ■ <br />9:>>Xr <br />EmyEm <br />mm <br />?M:S^-,:V3---‘;'.v3;..;,vpiiii <br />m' m- -mmrnym^m . I . ^ • •.-~mPHASE II:Deno existing Public Works Building and construct new City Hall/Police Building on Site A. ✓MUNICIPAL CAMPUS CONCEPTIf both City Hall and Public Works are located on the same site, the construction time and cost will be reduced.(Greater efficiently through shared facilities, better functional adjacencies, and shared parking areas would be achieved.C.SALE OF CURRENT CITY OWNED SITESSITE A: Existing Municipal SiteSITE B: Sewer Pond SiteValues of Both to be determined. <br />4. ORONO MUNICIPAL FACILITIES SQUARE FOOT COST RANGE FROM LOW TO AVERAGE <br />FOR BUDGET PURPOSES. <br />XiQ£L AVERAGE <br />CITY HALL <br />POLICE <br />PUBLIC WORKS <br />$65 S.F. <br />70 S.F. <br />35 S.F. <br />$75 S.F. <br />80 S.F. <br />42 S.F.C) <br />5. COMPARISON OF RECENT MUNICIPAL FACILITY COSTS <br />City Hall/PolIce Facilities <br />-Savage (1987) $75.00 S.F. <br />-Maplewood (1986) $83.00 S.F. <br />Police Faeilitieg <br />-Hutchinson (1987) $96.50 S.F. <br />-South lake Minnetonka (1987) $65.00 S.F. <br />Publ<c Works Facilities <br />-Savage (1988) $55.00 S.F. <br />-Chaska (1986) $41.50 S.F. <br />-Champlin (1987) $36.50 S.F. <br />C <br />*#•■ € ■,4». <br />mmmstfi!- <br />.-Vmmmm.mEmmM' <br />••A <br />.' 3..,: -■: <br />mwymM&My^irn5nv;i->•r- : ^ <br />•y;^- <br />EmryilkEE: E m. <br />ISMS <br />m& <br />EE% <br />W-eeM <br />P-E-'Mf,E-:yyEEEmm <br />WE/msmsmsmm^m <br />&E:. y.^^^EEEEj:M <br />wmmy y' <br />. • <br />X. ^•v= <br />1% >■•:': y-B;EEEm,m,r^y <br />UE/EyE/E/^. <br />iiili Em /Emm/E/sm.-.3^ 7= .■ \y <br />■mm <br />r-i= WEimtyyEEEy.:/E'EE <br />E'y -'3^ ’.r-: ' ‘ 1EyyE.EW>ri^^-^y^EE:/E-:-: yyu...EJ <br />JE <br />EmmumimEmEy <br />mwm <br />‘yEf