Laserfiche WebLink
I. <br />MINUTES OF THE STUBBS BAY SEWER HEARING - NOVEMBER 20, 1991 <br />h- <br />.. <br />,-k. <br />y <br />r;: <br />Crane replied that she can say that because she will be served <br />Immediately with sewer. <br />Cook explained that the Inclusion of Cygnet did reduce the amount <br />somewhat, but not equivalent to 29 times. He noted that by <br />taking out Cygnet Place, the trunk cost probably would be reduced <br />by $80,000. <br />Jabbour observed that Crane Is assuming that the City Is doing <br />everything wrong and that the City will not assume any additional <br />cost. <br />Crane felt that the line should be installed Immediately for <br />hookup, and later assessed for incremental cost. <br />Goetten explained that when looking at the area, they looked at <br />areas that were close to the lake that were having problems. She <br />noted there are some falling systems on Cygnet Place. <br />Crane noted that Cygnet Place was Included In the project without <br />the benefit of the general study. He noted that the City did not <br />review each property Individually. He felt the cost Implication <br />of adding in this area Is so detrimental to them that there Is no <br />way to Justify It, especially when there Is no Intent to supply <br />the lateral. <br />Cook noted the report recommends certain areas for Immediate <br />hookup. The report does not make a decision on who Is Included <br />or excluded from the project. He noted that If the full amount <br />Is assessed, the property would be able to hook up. <br />Crane noted that If only assessed for the trunk charge, he would <br />be unable to hook up, and felt his property was only Included In <br />the project to reduce the trunk cost for everyone else. <br />Don Gronberg, UO Leaf Street, noted his property Is vacant land <br />on which they had plans to build a retirement home. His property <br />:f .'t of an acre and asked If he would need variance approval to <br />bul iw <br />Goetten noted that If the lot was determined to be unbulldable, <br />there would be no assessment. <br />Gaffron reviewed that It is a substandard lot which would require <br />vsirlance approval to build. It should bo determined by both the <br />City and owner prior to assessment whether the lot would be <br />approved as bulldable. <br />Frank St. Lawrence, 253 Cygnet Place, asked If the cost could be <br />reduced If all agreed to the assessment by reducing the <br />litigation factor. <br />Mayor Peterson agreed that It would bo reduced If all agreed to <br />the project and assessment. <br />^ r.