Laserfiche WebLink
u <br />t <br />t'ivV <br />■ [■f <br />If’ <br />i. <br />s: <br />f- <br />\:I <br />ff- <br />i;- <br />S* Lot:s 1 and 2 are proposed to front on and access to a private <br />driveway to be constructed within a 50' outlet intended for <br />future development of a private road. <br />6* The existing residence within Lot 3 is proposed to maintain its <br />driveway access directly to Watertown Road. <br />7. Because this is technically a 3 lot subdivision^ a variance is <br />required in order to allow Lots 1 and 2 to access via a private <br />driveway in Outlet A, rather than requiring the construction of a <br />paved private road and cul-de-sac. Granting of this variance is <br />appropriate because: <br />a. The location of the garage serving the existing residence# <br />and the layout of existing buildings on the property, would <br />result In the need to construct a driveway 300' in length <br />and destroy certain trees and amenities of the existing <br />residence site. <br />b. The existing driveway location serving the existing <br />residence accesses Watertown Road at a location that is not <br />hazardous based on vertical or horizontal sight lines. <br />c« Because the property exists in two separate tax parcels, the <br />applicant could have taken advantage of a two-step process <br />of lot line rearrangment and platting which would have <br />resulted merely In the creation of two building lots In <br />nearly the Identical layout as the current proposal, without <br />the requirement for construction of a private road. Orono <br />codes allow a shared driveway access for up to two <br />residences• <br />d. Outlet A, while proposed to be developed at this time for <br />merely a driveway serving two new building sites. Is located <br />so as to be available for future extension to serve the <br />future development of Lot 3. <br />8. It is Intended that Outlet A and the driveway constructed within <br />It shall remain In the ownership of the owner of Lot 3. An <br />access easement will be required over Outlet A In favor of Lots 1 <br />and 2. The developer will be required to execute covenants to <br />define responsibility for construction and maintenance of the <br />driveway and Outlet A, and to define future financial obligation <br />at such time that the driveway Is upgraded to private or public <br />road status. <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />.5 ■ <br />k-*.: <br />■v, . <br />ILL-