Laserfiche WebLink
a- <br />a <br />i <br />. <br />>, ^1. <br />ff-0 <br />M,-: ■-' ■ .r y <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 18. 1991 <br />#1691 & 1702 - CONT. <br />Chair Kelley asked if the City of Long Lake understood the <br />ramifications of a limited lot coverage. <br />S<)uire said they understood it to include the principal residence <br />and all outbuildings on the property. <br />Chair Kelley asked how the City would safeguard the.t the zoning <br />restrictions imposed would not change. <br />Mabusth noted that restrictions would be included within the <br />covenant, and the City could specifically note all setbacks for <br />each lot. <br />Chair Kelley asked what aboui changes in Orono’s regulations, <br />would they apply? <br />Mabusth informed him that the property would be subject to <br />the agreed upon convenants and that the property would be located <br />in Long Lake and not subject to future changes in Orono codes. <br />Council member Callahan noted that the regulations for the <br />property will be frozen in time. If changes to the covenants are <br />proposed, they would have to be approved by both cities. <br />Bellows indicated she wanted the Planning Commission to be able <br />to review the covenant prior to fnal approval. <br />Mabufth noted that was not typica procedure but it could be <br />returned for review. <br />Bellows noted that part of their process was to approve the final <br />drainage and grading plan* which have not been supplied and felt <br />the application should be bled until all pertinent information <br />was supplied. <br />Chair Kelley asked that guest house use, rental apartments, home <br />occupations, and duplex use be adaressed in the covenant. <br />Mabusth stated that pertinent standards of the R-IA zoning <br />district could be incorporated within the covenant. <br />Xellenburger noted that it is interesting that the City of Long <br />Lake is endorsing the southern corridor for Highway 12 <br />considering the impact upon this property. <br />Chair Kelley stated that he could not comment on that issue. <br />Council member Goetten felt the issue was not within the <br />Commission's Jurisdiction. <br />Bellows felt it was a valid public opinion.