11-25-1991 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 18» 1991 ROLL The Orono Planning Commission meet on the above date with the following members present: Planning Commission Chair Charlie Kelley and Planning Commission Members Maureen Bellows, Candace Rowlette. Charles Schroeder and Jeff Johnson. Ed Cohen and Sara Moos were absent. The following represented the City Staff: Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Septic Manager Stephen Weckman, and City Recorder Teri Naab. The following Council Members were present: Council Members Jabbour. Goetten and Callahan. Chair Kelley called the meeting to o.'der at 7:00 p. m (#1) #1691 & #1702 CITY OF LONG LAKE, 130 ORONC ORCHARD ROAD NORTH A) AMENDMENT OF COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT PLAN/PRELIMINARY B) COHDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ?j:rA£?f5aJirir and certificate of Mailing was noted. David Squire of McCombs Frank Roos was present to represent the ^i^roa^ iulnifnras r^Ne*c!trCon ‘??!^ S: ^^a ed^nt was there to request Planning Commission action on this matter. Mabusth noted that this property was excluded from the subdivision moratorium. She noted the applicant are proposes a 13 lot PRD development based on existing standards ot the Z acre zoning. The property cons* ><-s of 24.5 acres and 26 acres are needed to satisfy the PRD r, rements. Applicants are seeking a lot area variance of 1.5 acr^ Each pad meets approximately a I acre density. She stated t..at Lot 1. Block 1 wo oot have interior access to the plat road. Mabusth pointed cut the road outlot at the north end would be designated as a separate out lot for possible future expansion to the north. The floocplain has been designed at 947.3' and therefore the lagoon cannoi be used for drainage from the development as it is below elevation. She noted that a retention pond may be needed in the southern portion of the property that may be needed to handle runoff from Lots 3, 4» 5 and 6. A retention pond is shown within Lots 11 and 12. for the northern portion also. Mabusth stated that the applicants propose special setbacks for several of the lots. Lot i; Block 1 would have a 25* setback from the roadway. Lots along Orono Oaks plat would have a 50* rear setback. All lots will meet a 35’ street setback and a 10' side setback. She noted that building pads have been proposed on either side of the forcemain within Lot 1, Block 2, which may be an issue to consider. is considering directing runoff through his property. He noted that he was not prepared to address the issue.