Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />1? <br />1” <br />t: <br />r:- <br />?r <br />t <br />r:-. <br />i-- <br />lb'.< <br />I'‘Vi. n: <br />♦,. i • <br />V . <br />> > ' <br />^-,- <br />I?-?: <br />E-vv ■ <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 12, 1991 <br />APPLICATION #1691 - CONT. <br />Mayor Paterson felt that members of the Council aUays understood <br />that the property would be developed as a PRO. <br />Barrett clarified that the term rezoning was used as a working <br />definition for this property. He noted that a PRO Is classified <br />as a separate zoning district In Orono’s code. He felt that any <br />cost that Long Lake would Incur In changing their application, <br />they will reap through benefits under the PRO development. <br />Mayor Swartwood asked If there would be any new encumberances If <br />the application were to be resubmitted. <br />Jabbour added that he had met with Moorse and Miller, Cc.incll <br />member of Long Lake, to discuss the application. Miller noted at <br />that time Long Lake had no problem amending the application to a <br />PRO development. Jabbour talked to residents who objected to the <br />rezoning and explained why the PRO would be a better development <br />plan. <br />Goetten felt the PRO development would be far more advantageous <br />for Long Lake. <br />Mabusth noted that the amended application Is scheduled for a <br />public hearing at 7:00 p.m. at the November 18th Planning <br />Commission meeting. She asked If the Council wished to reviw <br />the application at their next meeting, November 25th, which would <br />not be the typical procedure. <br />Jabbour noted that the minutes of the public hearing would have <br />to be reviewed early In order to allow the application to proceed <br />to the next Council meeting. <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to refer <br />Application #1691 for the City of Long Lake back to the Planning <br />Commission to be revised as a PRD development, and additional <br />application costs to be waived, and all other additional costs <br />Incurred In the amendment of the application are the City of Long <br />Lake's responsibility. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br /><#8) #1692 BRUCE W. ENGELSMA, <br />090 PARTENWOOO ROAD - <br />VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3041 <br />Bruce Engelsma was present for this application. <br />Moorse explained this Is a request for variances to construct an <br />addition to the existing residence. He noted the Planning <br />Commission voted 6*0 to recommend approval of the request. <br />It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt <br />Resolution #3041 for Application #1692 for Bruce W. Engelsma of <br />990 Partenwood Road, approving a variance to allow construction <br />of an addition to the existing residence. Ayes 4. nays 1.