Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Bruce C. Douglas <br />Page 2 <br />E.Roatinq activities remain a nuisance. We heartily <br />{mmpdiatelv in front of our dock and may force them <br />tHack out into the open water as we have suggested <br />many times and that Mr, Dunn once agreed to. <br />Wp are not interested in a "no cost slip" or having <br />clAll construct a U-shapad dock in front of our property <br />for mutual use. <br />continuously running engines (like the j <br />was revved up for most of Sunday, August lU <br />Aggravation. How can a salesman deliver his pitch over <br />all that noise? <br />F.llrare^noA?nmAterAn ‘lra?reAe^ <br />dock configuration approved by the LHCD and the City <br />0? OrSnS. we will nSt agree to adjusting side site <br />?etblcks; even 20* is inadequate, especially when it <br />is not observed. <br />II.3340 North Shore Drive (the Olson property) <br />A.• ■ m««..priatP the effort to date to clean up this <br />rnfrjg ‘^;eg:“r5fnrch:ra^s"u:i\^: A^n A JAriA^l" <br />request. <br />B.nnrkanp - 3340 It is our understanding that there is <br />nnp land only one rental slip on the Maxwell Bay side. <br />?[Ie boats packed there the last two weeks belong to <br />Chaska, however. Where, oh where, is the rente . <br />E.Fenci ig on the east lot line needs improvement. The <br />shoddy^fence at the cottonwood tree was hastily cojj* <br />!fJiicted earlier this year by Chaska employees. This <br />area needs attention, preferably using permanent, less <br />tacky materials. <br />F.Mixed Residential/Commercial Use: Again, comments will <br />bl made at the August 19 meeting depending on variances <br />requested or land use plan presented. <br />G.„ Ymir I15P of the phrasBS "minimize operational <br />iSoSet" lnd ‘-obligation to maximize cooperation so as to <br />euALte the inherent conflicts” is inappropriate.