Laserfiche WebLink
Tot Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse* City Administrator <br />Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />tetoi October 14, 1991 <br />I 91682 Christine Brickley, 3262 North Shore Drive - <br />Variance > Continuation of Public Hearing <br />List of â– ahiblte <br />A - Revised Garage Plan Submitted <br />B - Staff Sketch, Revised Site Plan <br />C - Notice of Planning CossRission Action 9/16/91 <br />D - Mmo and Exhibits of 10/6/91 <br />Moenooioo <br />Applicants have revised their garage proposal, reducing <br />Sise frost 1056 s.f. to 768 s.f. (24* x 32'). <br />the <br />i <br />t <br />V? <br />r <br />I,p <br />The revised garage of 768 s.f. requires 15* setbacks from <br />the vest end south lot lines. Applicants propose to stake use of <br />the recently poured slab, hence the new proposal leaves a 10.5* <br />setback to the south lot line and 3.3* to the west lot line. <br />At your September meeting, applicant indicated that the <br />garage and slab would not increase hardcover above the pre> <br />existing levels, because the previous garage and shed were <br />Msitioned near the west lot line with gravelled parking area in <br />front* hence the area covered by slab was already totally <br />hardeovered. Me have no photos or pre-existing survey to verify <br />this* however* in this case hardcover in the 75-250* tone would <br />rsSMin at 50.6% with the current plan. Applicants propose to use <br />the southerly 8* of the slab for boat and truck storage. <br />Isemea to Ook^idor <br />1. Is there sufficient hardship or justification to grant a <br />4.5* south lot line setback variance and 11.7* aide setback <br />variance to allow the proposed garage? <br />2. Onder the current proposal, lot coverage will stay at the <br />pre-existing level of 17.5%. The 768 s.f. garage contains <br />the equivalent enclosed space of the pre-existing shed, <br />garage* and storage barn. Is there sufficient hardship or <br />justification to grant a variance for 17.5% lot coverage? <br />3* It hardcover stays at its claimed pre-existing level of <br />50.6% in the 75-250* sone, is there hardcover in the 0-75* <br />tone that could be removed to coaq>ensate?