My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-12-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
11-12-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2024 12:14:09 PM
Creation date
7/23/2024 12:09:21 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
512
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
mUHtTi <br />Properties. Inc. <br />^ k 1 <br />IMIing Addrtss: <br />f. 0. Box 30 <br />MinnMpolii. MN 55440-0030 <br />608 2nd Ave. So. Suite 1100 <br />Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402*1937 <br />(612) 339-9611 <br />November 5, 1991 FAX » 47J-0510 <br />r -I <br />• * t <br />- i 1 <br />. ■■ T <br />r <br />City of Orous. <br />1335 Brown Road South <br />Orono, MN 55323 'UQV 6 1991 <br />Attn; Jeanne A. Mabush, Building and Zoning <br />Subject; Ammendments to Shadowood Farm Declaration <br />Dear Jeanne: <br />The aamendments to t/i_- Shadowood Farm Declaration recently submitted <br />for City Council review were submitted after review of the ammendments <br />revealed that clarification seemed appropriate. <br />The aittnendment regarding out Jot B was sutnutted beca >se it was never <br />intended that the Shadowood Farm Association would 5e responsible for <br />constri’-:tion and maintenance of the future road that was really <br />designated as a benefit to the City and another Jandovner. I hope that <br />the City Council will feel that if any road is ever built that its <br />construction and care should be the responsibi litu of the parties <br />benefited as quite honestly it is a detriment to the future ner <br />lots at the South end of the subdivision. <br />The ammendment affecting Jim Cox property is submitted after %,'^nsult. tion <br />with Jim. It was never our intention to have the association exercise <br />absolute control of future development or improvements to Mr. and Mrs. <br />Cox's property. The aimendment submitted I believe is a suitable <br />compromise and certainly takes in consideration of the existing controls <br />already in place by the City of Orono. <br />Thank you for your consideration of these requests. <br />Sincerely, <br />J. W. Franks <br />Vice President
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.