My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-12-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
11-12-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2024 12:14:09 PM
Creation date
7/23/2024 12:09:21 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
512
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
fr <br />Zoning File 11696 <br />November 5, 1991 <br />"*age 5 <br />Additional Coanents and Planning Coanission Reccanendation <br />The Planning Commission failed to effect a vote of <br />recommendation to the Council resulting in a 3 to 3 split vote. <br />The issue for all members was the increase in hardcover that <br />produces a 10% hardcover variance at proposed 35%. All members <br />concurred that an attached garage constructed at the street level <br />was appropriate because of the limited street yard width at 33*. <br />The three members who voted to deny the application as proposed <br />recommended a footprint at 24' x 23' (two-stall garage). Members <br />that chose to deny the application did not agree that an interior <br />access to the residence was necessary The applicant was advised <br />that the 1-1/2' deck shown in the street yard was considered an <br />encroachment and could not be approved as it would bring the <br />structure 8-1/2' from the street lot line. Members who voted to <br />approve Mr. Ward's proposal felt that staff's suggestion to <br />consider limiting total structure to merely a two-stall garage <br />and the 6' access stair at 32' x 23* had a minimal effect on the <br />overall hardcover (applicants footprint proposed at 23' x 35' or <br />805 s.f. and staff's suggestion with a footprint proposed at 23' <br />X 32' or 736 s.f. resulted in a reduction of only 69 s.f. or <br />0.82%). <br />Revieir of Total Bardcover Within the 75-250' Setback Area <br />Allowed - 2,097.25 s.f. or 25% <br />Applicants proposal (approved by 3 members of the Planning <br />Commission) * 2,976.41 s.f. or 35% <br />Hardcover per denial vote « 2,699.41 s.f. or 32.17% <br />Council members are asked to review Page 3 and 4 where staff <br />lists ex ting and proposed hardcover improvements relating to <br />area ar' percentages of hardcover. Council members may wish to <br />seek add.tional removals. The Planning Commission did not <br />address staff's request for written confirmation from a well <br />contractor that well can be serviced as shown on approved plan. <br />The condition has been included in the enclosed approval <br />resolution. <br />All members concurred that tlie street setback required for <br />this principal structure addition would be 35' rather than 10' <br />for a garage addition. The street setback variance required is <br />for 25' or 71.%. <br />An approval resolution has been drafted with appropriate <br />blank spaces. The resolution can be completed once Council has <br />determined the allowed percentage for the hardcover variance <br />within the 75-250' setback area. <br />Isv
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.