My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-12-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
11-12-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2024 12:14:09 PM
Creation date
7/23/2024 12:09:21 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
512
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
f <br />Mr. David Squire <br />October 24, 1991 <br />Page 3 <br />2. The benefit of the PRD in this case will be that you may <br />include the area of the plat road and areas to be dedicated <br />for Orono Orchard Road in your dry buildable calcuations. <br />Now that the lot standards of the 1 acre zoning are no <br />longer applicable you may wish to realign your lots or pads <br />to pick up an additional unit on the east side of the <br />property and combine originally proposed Lots 1 and 2, Block <br />1 as one pad. Current RR-IB zoning standards are 50 <br />and front and 30' side setbacks. You may request special <br />setback standards per the directives of the PRD ordinance <br />which you have already received from the City. You may seek <br />special setbacks for building pads that differ from the <br />underlying zoning standards but the City cannot waive the <br />special standards set forth for wetland protection? i.e., <br />the 26’ setback from a wetland. <br />3. Designate the building envelope for each of the 13 pads <br />designating the special setbacks sought by applicant. <br />Proposed location of each residence within that pad and as <br />in the original proposal the first floor elevation of each <br />of the residences (I* above flood plain elevation of <br />property). <br />4. Issue of road realignment. Although we did not have a <br />chance to discuss any of the other issues raised during the <br />review by affected neighbors, clearly the impact upon the <br />owner to the south will become an issue when the application <br />is reviewed at our next meeting. Now that the property is <br />to be subdivided as a PRD, can the road be realigned to <br />follow the access road? If not, your preliminary plan <br />should show utility easement over 16" force main not be <br />included in road outlet. <br />5 It will be necessary with the final plat to designate <br />drainage and utility Lsements 1C ’ wide along all exterior <br />boundaries of property and adjacent to all interior lot <br />lines. Drainage and utility easements need only be shown at <br />a 5’ width on either side of interior lot/pad lines. This <br />is only mentioned now as a consideration in the design of <br />the building pads. <br />Additional Inforaation/Submittals Remaining Per Original Review Cements <br />1. jetermination of OHW of pond/lagoon as requested J^he DNR. The <br />llgoon area to be defined as a DNR Protected Wetland with <br />specific numerical designation. <br />2. Determination of flood plain elevation or 1°° <br />and resolve of the water quality issues raised by the Watershed <br />District. Staff would once again encourage a meeting with tne <br />Watershed as soon as possible so that the November 1st deadline <br />date can be met.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.