Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1691 <br />November €, 1991 <br />Page 2 <br />In approximately 1982 the entire parcel consisted of 25 <br />acres. one-half acre was divided off and is shown as the <br />exception on the plat. The 1/2 acre parcel was conveyed to the <br />HWCC for the lift station. Appropriate easements were granted <br />over the 16" force main that extends southward to Orono Orchard <br />Road. The force main appears to follow predominantly the path of <br />the existing driveway that serves the MWCC lift station and <br />former sewer pond site. The property is currently used by the <br />City of Long Lake for outside storage, both permanent and <br />temporaryr similar to Orono’s use of the Orono sewer pond site. <br />Based on the directives in the Settlement Agreement (Exhibit <br />E) entered into by both Cities, the applicant has been advised to <br />seek rezoning to 1 acre. When staff was contacted by the <br />surrounding property owners, they questioned the rezoning to 1 <br />acre and were concerned that Long Lake could further subdivide in <br />the future. Staff responded that with the conventional plat the <br />property would be completely restricted from future development <br />of open space areas as may possibly be the case with a PRD. The <br />agreements between the two Cities also suggested that covenants <br />were to be filed against the Chain of Title of the property once <br />again reaffirming the development controls of the City of Orono <br />(review Exhibit D). <br />There were several other issues raised in the review memo <br />prepared for the Planning Commission that were unfortunately not <br />addressed because the Planning Commission refused to discuss the <br />current proposal because it included a rezoning application from <br />the 2 acre to 1 acre zoning. The Planning Commission denied the <br />rezoning application finding ‘he rezoning to be in complete <br />conflict with the directives .-i the Comprehensive Plan of the <br />City. Members should review the minutes of the October 21st <br />meeting for specific comments of the >lic in attendance. Based <br />on the conceptual direction given staff by the four Council <br />members in attendance at that meeting, staff has prepared a <br />denial resolution for the rezoning phase of Applicatio; #1691. A <br />public hearing has been scheduled at the Planning Comirission's <br />meeting of November 21st at 7:00 p.m. to once again review <br />comprehensive land use Application #1691 that will now include a <br />conditional use permit for a Planned Residential Development of <br />13 units based on the current RR-IB zoning. <br />Please review the enclosed letter to David Squire (Exhibit <br />P)r planning consultant for the City of Long Lake. Please note <br />the applicant was given the opportunity to withdraw the <br />application and to apply the original fee against the conditional <br />use permit. Squire advised that the City of Long Lake at a <br />recent meeting requested action on the rezoning application. <br />Please note staff has recommended the tabling of the <br />comprehensive application because we failed to receive the <br />necessary hydraulic information to determine ordering high water <br />mark of pond and flood plain elevation. We have received <br />confirmation from the Department of Natural Resources that the <br />Ordinary Bigh Water Mark has been determined for the sewer <br />pond/lagoon area and the necessary hydraulic information to