My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-12-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
11-12-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2024 12:14:09 PM
Creation date
7/23/2024 12:09:21 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
512
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r; <br />•- ■. <br />c' <br />I-.- <br />!•H' <br />NINUTtS OF THI FIOULAF OFONO COUNCIL MEITXNO - OCTOIIN 2t, 1091 <br />•ID AWARD - CITY FACILITIES - CONT. <br />Davits notad that the four items listed at the bottom of the <br />sheet are listed as add Items and are not Included in the numbers <br />above, which Include the retaining walls for the Public Works, <br />the lealn culvert and weir, culverts under berms and the site <br />fence for the Public works building. He noted these Items were <br />Included In the drawings but were not Included In the budget. <br />Boaraan explained that these items were added as they went <br />through the design process or as the surveyor went through the <br />approval process with the City Engineer. He noted that those <br />Iteas are thcjght of as being needed. <br />Jabbour asked If the Items could be eliminated by allowing the <br />water to drain naturally. <br />Boaraan felt the retaining wall could oe reworked, the culvert <br />and the berm are the most realistic and the fence could be <br />Installed at a later date. He noted that the culvert and berm <br />are functional Items and should be addressed at this time. <br />Davies felt that section «2 on the last page of the bid <br />tabulation should be tabled at this time to allow review of the <br />four additional items. <br />Jabbour noted that the Design committee did look at adding berms <br />to the property. He noted there are members that feel that the <br />Public Works building should be sheltered from everyone at any <br />cost. Me felt the most Important Issue at this time Is to make <br />sure that all items approved are functlohol and necessary. <br />Callahan asked if the retaining walls supplied inside storage for <br />the Public Works Department. <br />Qerhardson noted the retaining walls are used for the storage of <br />materials that require a wall to push the bucket against In the <br />loading of such materials. <br />Callahan reiterated that with the Inclusion of the four <br />additional items, we are over budget by $100,000 and felt It was <br />a bad start. <br />Boarman noted that items should not be approved until they fit <br />Into the budget. <br />Davies noted that one bidder supplied the bid later or beyond <br />dosing time, which happens to be the low bid. <br />Barrett noted that approval shoulo be subject to submittal of the <br />attorney's opinion, to follow the next day. <br />It was moved by Butler. seconded by Jabbour. to approve Kraus <br />Anderson's recommended bid award for Items #1. 3. 4. 5 and 6 of <br />Page 4 of the bid tabulation submitted. Ayes 5. nays 0. <br />i <br />i ' ■ .
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.