Laserfiche WebLink
Existing harder*'*'* <br />is no hardcovo <br />ol 0.3 acre, <br />attached garage .. <br />granting of a hazdc <br />the 75-250' zune is 39.6%. There <br />? 0-75' zone. The small lot size <br />€t location of the house with <br />inimal driveway, all support the <br />•r variance. <br />c) The proposed 10'x26' three-season porch replaces a pre­ <br />existing 10*x26 ‘ upper level deck in the exact same <br />location, hence the impact of the change in the nature <br />of the structure is minimal. No lot coverage or <br />average setback variance is required for this proposal. <br />d) There is no extraneous excess hardcover on the property <br />’-fhich can reasonably be removed to result in a decrease <br />from tho pre-existing level of hardcover. <br />4. The City Council has considered this application including <br />the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, <br />reports by City s’jaff, comments by the applicant and the <br />e:^fect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br />welfare of the community. <br />5, The City Council findc that the conditions existing on this <br />property are peculiar to i and do not apply generally to <br />other property In this zc ing district; that granting the <br />variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, <br />light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to <br />neighboring property; would not merely se^^^e « <br />convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate <br />a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary c <br />preserve a substantial pr*ip^rty right of the applicant; and <br />would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning <br />Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />Page 2 of 6