Laserfiche WebLink
[■' <br />t <br />'A <br />r <br />IP <br />Zoning File #1693 <br />October 16, 1991 <br />Page 4 <br />9.In general, the concept of a private road and cul-de- <br />sac appears reasonable for this property. The location <br />and topography near the existing house would not allow <br />for a reasonable road connection to the adjacent <br />property to the west, nor is such a connection needed. <br />Staff Race datioB <br />I. <br />XI. <br />lav <br />Because this is a sketch plan, the Planning Commission <br />should merely give applicants general direction and note any <br />obvious concerns that should be addressed as follows: <br />A.Conditional use permit/variance for wetland <br />encroachments by roads and driveways. <br />B.Requirement to construct private road with standard <br />easements and covenants. <br />C. Lot width variances. <br />D.Revisions of lot lines to allow <br />developable sites, especially Lot 2. <br />or reasonably <br />B.Verification of capability/expandability of dralnfield <br />sites and adherence to 20* lot line setbacks. <br />P.General advisory regarding the need for wetland <br />easements. Note that the wetlands at the north end of <br />Lot 1 and straddling the north end of Lots >2 and 3, <br />likely will be subject to wetland easements although <br />they do not appear on Orono's designated wetland maps. <br />Regarding the variance to the moratorium, the Planning <br />Cosmiission must make a recommendation to the Council whether <br />or not the strict criteria for a moratorium variance are <br />met, and whether granting a variance to the moratorium for <br />this proposed rubdivision would be in the best interests of <br />the City. (Note that your recommendation regarding the <br />moratorium will be scheduled for the October 28 Council <br />meeting so that the applicants receive a timely decision <br />whether or not they can proceed with a full subdivision <br />application). <br />% <br />.........